Browsing by Author "Kapoor, D."

Now showing 1 - 9 of 9

Acute-on-chronic liver failure:consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific association for the study of the liver (APASL):an update.
(Springer,, 2019) Sarin, S.K.; Choudhury, A.; Sharma, M.K.; Maiwall, R.; Al Mahtab, M.; Rahman, S.; Saigal, S.; Saraf, N.; Soin, A.S.; Devarbhavi, H.; Kim, D.J.; Dhiman, R.K.; Duseja, A.; Taneja, S.; Eapen, C.E.; Goel, A.; Ning, Q.; Chen, T.; Ma, K.; Duan, Z.; Yu, C.; Treeprasertsuk, S.; Hamid, S.S.; Butt, A.S.; Hamid, S.S.; Butt, A.S.; Jafri, W.; Shukla, A.; Saraswat, V.; Tan, S.S.; Sood, A.; Midha, V.; Goyal, O.; Ghazinyan, H.; Arora, A.; Hu, J.; Sahu, M.; Rao, P.N.; Lee, G.H.; Lim, S.G.; Lesmana, L.A.; Lesmana, C.R.; Shah, S.; Prasad, V.G.M.; Payawal, D.A.; Abbas, Z.; Dokmeci, A.K.; Sollano, J.D.; Carpio, G.; Shresta, A.; Lau, G.K.; Fazal Karim, M.; Shiha, G.; Gani, R.; Kalista, K.F.; Yuen, M.F.; Alam, S.; Khanna, R.; Sood, V.; Lal, B.B.; Pamecha, V.; Jindal, A.; Rajan, V.; Arora, V.; Yokosuka, O.; Niriella, M.A.; Li, H.; Qi, X.; Tanaka, A.; Mochida, S.; Chaudhuri, D.R.; Gane, E.; Win, K.M.; Chen, W.T.; Rela, M.; Kapoor, D.; Rastogi, A.; Kale, P.; Rastogi, A.; Sharma, C.B.; Bajpai, M.; Singh, V.; Premkumar, M.; Maharashi, S.; Olithselvan, A.; Philips, C.A.; Srivastava, A.; Yachha, S.K.; Wani, Z.A.; Thapa, B.R.; Saraya, A.; Shalimar; Kumar, A.; Wadhawan, M.; Gupta, S.; Madan, K.; Sakhuja, P.; Vij, V.; Sharma, B.C.; Garg, H.; Garg, V.; Kalal, C.; Anand, L.; Vyas, T.; Mathur, R.P.; Kumar, G.; Jain, P.; Pasupuleti, S.S.R.; Chawla, Y.K.; Chowdhury, A.; Alam, S.; Song, D.S.; Yang, J.M.; Yoon, E.L.; APASL ACLF Research Consortium (AARC) for APASL ACLF working Party
The first consensus report of the working party of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) set up in 2004 on acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) was published in 2009. With international groups volunteering to join, the "APASL ACLF Research Consortium (AARC)" was formed in 2012, which continued to collect prospective ACLF patient data. Based on the prospective data analysis of nearly 1400 patients, the AARC consensus was published in 2014. In the past nearly four-and-a-half years, the AARC database has been enriched to about 5200 cases by major hepatology centers across Asia. The data published during the interim period were carefully analyzed and areas of contention and new developments in the field of ACLF were prioritized in a systematic manner. The AARC database was also approached for answering some of the issues where published data were limited, such as liver failure grading, its impact on the 'Golden Therapeutic Window', extrahepatic organ dysfunction and failure, development of sepsis, distinctive features of acute decompensation from ACLF and pediatric ACLF and the issues were analyzed. These initiatives concluded in a two-day meeting in October 2018 at New Delhi with finalization of the new AARC consensus. Only those statements, which were based on evidence using the Grade System and were unanimously recommended, were accepted. Finalized statements were again circulated to all the experts and subsequently presented at the AARC investigators meeting at the AASLD in November 2018. The suggestions from the experts were used to revise and finalize the consensus. After detailed deliberations and data analysis, the original definition of ACLF was found to withstand the test of time and be able to identify a homogenous group of patients presenting with liver failure. New management options including the algorithms for the management of coagulation disorders, renal replacement therapy, sepsis, variceal bleed, antivirals and criteria for liver transplantation for ACLF patients were proposed. The final consensus statements along with the relevant background information and areas requiring future studies are presented here.
Antenatal oral glucose tolerance test abnormalities in the prediction of future risk of postpartum diabetes in women with gestational diabetes: Results from the living study
(Blackwell Publishing Asia, 2024) Gupta, Y.; Kapoor, D.; Lakshmi, J.K.; Praveen, D.; Santos, J.A.; Billot, L.; Naheed, A.; De Silva, H.A.; Gupta, I.; Farzana, N.; John, R.; Ajanthan, S.; Bhatla, N.; Desai, A.; Pathmeswaran, A.; Prabhakaran, D.; Teede, H.; Zoungas, S.; Patel, A.; Tandon, N.
OBJECTIVES To explore associations between type and number of abnormal glucose values on antenatal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with postpartum diabetes in South Asian women diagnosed with gestational diabetes (GDM) using International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria.METHODS This post-hoc evaluation of the Lifestyle Intervention IN Gestational Diabetes (LIVING) study, a randomized controlled trial, was conducted among women with GDM in the index pregnancy, across 19 centers in Bangladesh, India, and Sri Lanka. Postpartum diabetes (outcome) was defined on OGTT, using American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria.RESULTS We report data on 1468 women with GDM, aged 30.9 (5.0) years, and with median (interquartile range) follow-up period of 1.8 (1.4-2.4) years after childbirth following the index pregnancy. We found diabetes in 213 (14.5%) women with an incidence of 8.7 (7.6-10.0)/100 women-years. The lowest incidence rate was 3.8/100 women years, in those with an isolated fasting plasma glucose (FPG) abnormality, and highest was 19.0/100 women years in participants with three abnormal values. The adjusted hazard ratios for two and three abnormal values compared to one abnormal value were 1.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-2.54; p = .005) and 3.56 (95% CI, 2.46-5.16; p < .001) respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio for the combined (combination of fasting and postglucose load) abnormalities was 2.61 (95% CI, 1.70-4.00; p < .001), compared to isolated abnormal FPG.CONCLUSIONS Risk of diabetes varied significantly depending upon the type and number of abnormal values on antenatal OGTT. These data may inform future precision medicine approaches such as risk prediction models in identifying women at higher risk and may guide future targeted interventions.
APASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of acute kidney injury in acute-on-chronic liver failure.
(Springer, 2024) Maiwall, R.; Singh, S.P.; Angeli, P.; Moreau, R.; Krag, A.; Singh, V.; Singal, A.K.; Tan, S.S.; Puri, P.; Mahtab, M.; Lau, G.; Ning, Q.; Sharma, M.K.; Rao, P.N.; Kapoor, D.; Gupta, S.; Duseja, A.; Wadhawan, M.; Jothimani, D.; Saigal, S.; Taneja, S.; Shukla, A.; Govil, D.; Pandey, G.; Madan, K.; Eapen, C.E.; Benjamin, J.; Chowdhury, A.; Salao, V.; Yang, J.M.; Hamid, S.; Shalimar; Jasuja, S.; Kulkarni, A.V.; Niriella, M.A.; Tevethia, H.V.; Arora, V.; Mathur, R.P.; Roy, A.; Jindal, A.; Saraf, N.; Verma, N.; Arka, D.; Choudhary, N.S.; Mehtani, R.; Chand, P.; Rudra, O.; Sarin, S.K.; Puri, P.; Singh, S.
Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a syndrome that is characterized by the rapid development of organ failures predisposing these patients to a high risk of short-term early death. The main causes of organ failure in these patients are bacterial infections and systemic inflammation, both of which can be severe. For the majority of these patients, a prompt liver transplant is still the only effective course of treatment. Kidneys are one of the most frequent extrahepatic organs that are affected in patients with ACLF, since acute kidney injury (AKI) is reported in 22.8-34% of patients with ACLF. Approach and management of kidney injury could improve overall outcomes in these patients. Importantly, patients with ACLF more frequently have stage 3 AKI with a low rate of response to the current treatment modalities. The objective of the present position paper is to critically review and analyze the published data on AKI in ACLF, evolve a consensus, and provide recommendations for early diagnosis, pathophysiology, prevention, and management of AKI in patients with ACLF. In the absence of direct evidence, we propose expert opinions for guidance in managing AKI in this very challenging group of patients and focus on areas of future research. This consensus will be of major importance to all hepatologists, liver transplant surgeons, and intensivists across the globe.
Correction to: Acute-on-chronic liver failure: consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific association for the study of the liver (APASL): an update
(Springer, 2019) Sarin, S.K.; Choudhury, A.; Sharma, M.K.; Maiwall, R.; Al Mahtab, M.; Rahman, S.; Saigal, S.; Saraf, N.; Soin, A.S.; Devarbhavi, H.; Kim, D.J.; Dhiman, R.K.; Duseja, A.; Taneja, S.; Eapen, C.E.; Goel, A.; Ning, Q.; Chen, T.; Ma, K.; Duan, Z.; Yu, C.; Treeprasertsuk, S.; Hamid, S.S.; Butt, A.S.; Jafri, W.; Shukla, A.; Saraswat, V.; Tan, S.S.; Sood, A.; Midha, V.; Goyal, O.; Ghazinyan, H.; Arora, A.; Hu, J.; Sahu, M.; Rao, P.N.; Lee, G.H.; Lim, S.G.; Lesmana, L.A.; Lesmana, C.R.; Shah, S.; Prasad, V.G.M.; Payawal, D.A.; Abbas, Z.; Dokmeci, A.K.; Sollano, J.D.; Carpio, G.; Shresta, A.; Lau, G.K.; Karim, M.F.; Shiha, G.; Gani, R.; Kalista, K.F.; Yuen, M.F.; Alam, S.; Khanna, R.; Sood, V.; Lal, B.B.; Pamecha, V.; Jindal, A.; Rajan, V.; Arora, V.; Yokosuka, O.; Niriella, M.A.; Li, H.; Qi, X.; Tanaka, A.; Mochida, S.; Chaudhuri, D.R.; Gane, E.; Win, K.M.; Chen, W.T.; Rela, M.; Kapoor, D.; Rastogi, A.; Kale, P.; Rastogi, A.; Sharma, C.B.; Bajpai, M.; Singh, V.; Premkumar, M.; Maharashi, S.; Olithselvan, A.; Philips, C.A.; Srivastava, A.; Yachha, S.K.; Wani, Z.A.; Thapa, B.R.; Saraya, A.; Shalimar; Kumar, A.; Wadhawan, M.; Gupta, S.; Madan, K.; Sakhuja, P.; Vij, V.; Sharma, B.C.; Garg, H.; Garg, V.; Kalal, C.; Anand, L.; Vyas, T.; Mathur, R.P.; Kumar, G.; Jain, P.; Pasupuleti, S.S.R.; Chawla, Y.K.; Chowdhury, A.; Alam, S.; Song, D.S.; Yang, J.M.; Yoon, E.L.; APASL ACLF Research Consortium (AARC) for APASL ACLF working Party
The article Acute-on-chronic liver failure: consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacifc association for the study of the liver (APASL): an update, written by [Shiv Sarin], was originally published electronically on the publisher’s internet portal (currently SpringerLink) on June 06, 2019 without open access. This corrects the article "Acute-on-chronic liver failure: consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific association for the study of the liver (APASL): an update" in Hepatol Int, volume 13 on page 353. Hepatology International. 2019 ;13(4):353-390.
Development of a risk prediction model for postpartum onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus, following gestational diabetes; the lifestyle InterVention in gestational diabetes (LIVING) study
(Elsevier, 2024) Belsti, Y.; Moran, L.J.; Goldstein, R.; Mousa, A.; Cooray, S.D.; Baker, S.; Gupta, Y.; Patel, A.; Tandon, N.; Ajanthan, S.; John, R.; Naheed, A.; Chakma, N.; Lakshmi, J.K.; Zoungas, S.; Billot, L.; Desai, A.; Bhatla, N.; Prabhakaran, D.; Gupta, I.; De Silva, H.A.; Kapoor, D.; Praveen, D.; Farzana, N.; Enticott, J.; Teede, H.
AIMS This study aimed to develop a prediction model for identifying a woman with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) at high risk of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) post-birth.METHODS Utilising data from 1299 women in the Lifestyle Intervention IN Gestational Diabetes (LIVING) study, two models were developed: one for pregnancy and another for postpartum. Key predictors included glucose test results, medical history, and biometric indicators.RESULTS Of the initial cohort, 124 women developed T2DM within three years. The study identified seven predictors for the antenatal T2DM risk prediction model and four for the postnatal one. The models demonstrated good to excellent predictive ability, with Area under the ROC Curve (AUC) values of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.72 to 0.80) and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.81 to 0.88) for the antenatal and postnatal models, respectively. Both models underwent rigorous validation, showing minimal optimism in predictive capability. Antenatal model, considering the Youden index optimal cut-off point of 0.096, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were measured as 70.97%, 70.81%, and 70.82%, respectively. For the postnatal model, considering the cut-off point 0.086, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were measured as 81.40%, 75.60%, and 76.10%, respectively.CONCLUSIONS These models are effective for predicting T2DM risk in women with GDM, although external validation is recommended before widespread application.
Effects of a Lifestyle Intervention to Prevent Deterioration in Glycemic Status Among South Asian Women With Recent Gestational Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial
(American Medical Association, 2022) Tandon, N.; Gupta, Y.; Kapoor, D.; Lakshmi, J.K.; Praveen, D.; Bhattacharya, A.; Billot, L.; Naheed, A.; de Silva, A.; Gupta, I.; Farzana, N.; John, R.; Ajanthan, S.; Divakar, H.; Bhatla, N.; Desai, A.; Pathmeswaran, A.; Prabhakaran, D.; Joshi, R.; Jan, S.; Teede, H.; Zoungas, S.; Patel, A.; LIVING Collaborative Group.
Importance: Women with recent gestational diabetes (GDM) have increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Objective: To investigate whether a resource-appropriate and context-appropriate lifestyle intervention could prevent glycemic deterioration among women with recent GDM in South Asia. Design, setting, and participants: This randomized, participant-unblinded controlled trial investigated a 12-month lifestyle intervention vs usual care at 19 urban hospitals in India, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh. Participants included women with recent diagnosis of GDM who did not have type 2 diabetes at an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) 3 to 18 months postpartum. They were enrolled from November 2017 to January 2020, and follow-up ended in January 2021. Data were analyzed from April to July 2021. Interventions: A 12-month lifestyle intervention focused on diet and physical activity involving group and individual sessions, as well as remote engagement, adapted to local context and resources. This was compared with usual care. Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was worsening category of glycemia based on OGTT using American Diabetes Association criteria: (1) normal glucose tolerance to prediabetes (ie, impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance) or type 2 diabetes or (2) prediabetes to type 2 diabetes. The primary analysis consisted of a survival analysis of time to change in glycemic status at or prior to the final patient visit, which occurred at varying times after 12 months for each patient. Secondary outcomes included new-onset type 2 diabetes and change in body weight. Results: A total of 1823 women (baseline mean [SD] age, 30.9 [4.9] years and mean [SD] body mass index, 26.6 [4.6]) underwent OGTT at a median (IQR) 6.5 (4.8-8.2) months postpartum. After excluding 160 women (8.8%) with type 2 diabetes, 2 women (0.1%) who met other exclusion criteria, and 49 women (2.7%) who did not consent or were uncontactable, 1612 women were randomized. Subsequently, 11 randomized participants were identified as ineligible and excluded from the primary analysis, leaving 1601 women randomized (800 women randomized to the intervention group and 801 women randomized to usual care). These included 600 women (37.5%) with prediabetes and 1001 women (62.5%) with normoglycemia. Among participants randomized to the intervention, 644 women (80.5%) received all program content, although COVID-19 lockdowns impacted the delivery model (ie, among 644 participants who engaged in all group sessions, 476 women [73.9%] received some or all content through individual engagement, and 315 women [48.9%] received some or all content remotely). After a median (IQR) 14.1 (11.4-20.1) months of follow-up, 1308 participants (81.2%) had primary outcome data. The intervention, compared with usual care, did not reduce worsening glycemic status (204 women [25.5%] vs 217 women [27.1%]; hazard ratio, 0.92; [95% CI, 0.76-1.12]; P = .42) or improve any secondary outcome. Conclusions and relevance: This study found that a large proportion of women in South Asian urban settings developed dysglycemia soon after a GDM-affected pregnancy and that a lifestyle intervention, modified owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, did not prevent subsequent glycemic deterioration. These findings suggest that alternate or additional approaches are needed, especially among high-risk individuals.
Feasibility of a lifestyle intervention program for prevention of diabetes among women with prior gestational Diabetes Mellitus (LIVING Study) in South Asia: A formative research study
(Frontiers Media S.A, 2020) Tewari, A.; Praveen, D.; Madhira, P.; Josyula, L.K.; Joshi, R.; Kokku, S.B.; Garg, V.; Rawal, I.; Chopra, K.; Chakma, N.; Ahmed, S.; Pathmeswaran, A.; Godamunne, P.; Lata, A.S.; Sahay, R.; Patel, T.; Gupta, Y.; Tandon, N.; Naheed, A.; Patel, A.; Kapoor, D.
AIM: To refine and contextually adapt a postpartum lifestyle intervention for prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in Bangladesh, India, and Sri Lanka. Materials and Methods: In-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with women with current diagnosis of GDM, and health care professionals involved in their management, to understand relevant local contextual factors for intervention optimization and implementation. This paper describes facilitators and barriers as well as feedback from participants on how to improve the proposed intervention. These factors were grouped and interpreted along the axes of the three main determinants of behavior-capability, opportunity, and motivation. IDIs and FGDs were digitally recorded, transcribed, and translated. Data-driven inductive thematic analysis was undertaken to identify and analyze patterns and themes. Results: Two interrelated themes emerged from the IDIs and FGDs: (i) The lifestyle intervention was acceptable and considered to have the potential to improve the existing model of care for women with GDM; and (ii) Certain barriers such as reduced priority of self-care, and adverse societal influences postpartum need to be addressed for the improvement of GDM care. Based on the feedback, the intervention was optimized by including messages for family members in the content of the intervention, providing options for both text and voice messages as reminders, and finalizing the format of the intervention session delivery. Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of contextual factors in influencing postpartum care and support for women diagnosed with GDM in three South Asian countries. It indicates that although provision of postpartum care is complex, a group lifestyle intervention program is highly acceptable to women with GDM, as well as to health care professionals, at urban hospitals.
The incidence and risk factors of postpartum diabetes in women from Bangladesh, India and Sri Lanka (South Asia) with prior gestational diabetes mellitus: Results from the LIVING study
(Elsevier, 2023) Gupta, Y.; Kapoor, D.; Lakshmi, J.K.; Praveen, D.; Santos, J.A.; Billot, L.; Naheed, A.; de Silva, H.A.; Gupta, I.; Farzana, N.; John, R.; Ajanthan, S.; Bhatla, N.; Desai, A.; Pathmeswaran, A.; Prabhakaran, D.; Teede, H.; Zoungas, S.; Patel, A.; Tandon, N.; LIVING Collaborative Group
AIM: To study, the incidence and risk factors for postpartum diabetes (DM), in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) from South Asia (Bangladesh, India and Sri Lanka), followed for nearly two years after delivery. METHODS: Women with prior GDM diagnosed using IADPSG criteria were invited at 19 centres across Bangladesh, India and Sri Lanka for an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) following childbirth, and were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial. The glycaemic category (outcome) was defined from an OGTT based on American Diabetes Association criteria. RESULTS: Participants (n = 1808) recruited had a mean ± SD age of 31.0 ± 5.0 years. Incident DM was identified, between childbirth and the last follow-up, in 310 (17.1 %) women [incidence 10.75/100 person years], with a median follow-up duration of 1.82 years after childbirth. Higher age, lower education status, higher prior pregnancy count, prior history of GDM, family history of DM, and postpartum overweight/obese status were significantly associated with incident DM. Women in Bangladesh had a higher cumulative incidence of DM [16.49/100 person years] than in Sri Lanka [12.74/100 person years] and India [7.21/100 person years]. CONCLUSIONS: A high incidence of DM was found in women with prior GDM in South Asia, with significant variation between countries. Women from Bangladesh had a significantly higher pregnancy count, family history of DM and overweight/obese status, despite having significantly lower age, which could be responsible for their higher rates of DM. Registration of this study: The study was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2017/06/008744), Sri Lanka Clinical Trials Registry (SLCTR/2017/001), and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03305939).
A lifestyle intervention programme for the prevention of Type 2 diabetes mellitus among South Asian women with gestational diabetes mellitus [LIVING study]: protocol for a randomized trial
(Wiley-Blackwell, 2019) Gupta, Y.; Kapoor, D.; Josyula, L.K.; Praveen, D.; Naheed, A.; Desai, A.K.; Pathmeswaran, A.; de Silva, H.A.; Lombard, C.B.; Shamsul Alam, D.; Prabhakaran, D.; Teede, H.J.; Billot, L.; Bhatla, N.; Joshi, R.; Zoungas, S.; Jan, S.; Patel, A.; Tandon, N.
AIM:This study aims to determine whether a resource- and culturally appropriate lifestyle intervention programme in South Asian countries, provided to women with gestational diabetes (GDM) after childbirth, will reduce the incidence of worsening of glycaemic status in a manner that is affordable, acceptable and scalable. METHODS: Women with GDM (diagnosed by oral glucose tolerance test using the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria) will be recruited from 16 hospitals in India, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. Participants will undergo a repeat oral glucose tolerance test at 6 ± 3 months postpartum and those without Type 2 diabetes, a total sample size of 1414, will be randomly allocated to the intervention or usual care. The intervention will consist of four group sessions, 84 SMS or voice messages and review phone calls over the first year. Participants requiring intensification of the intervention will receive two additional individual sessions over the latter half of the first year. Median follow-up will be 2 years. The primary outcome is the proportion of women with a change in glycaemic category, using the American Diabetes Association criteria: (i) normal glucose tolerance to impaired fasting glucose, or impaired glucose tolerance, or Type 2 diabetes; or (ii) impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance to Type 2 diabetes. Process evaluation will explore barriers and facilitators of implementation of the intervention in each local context, while trial-based and modelled economic evaluations will assess cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: The study will generate important new evidence about a potential strategy to address the long-term sequelae of GDM, a major and growing problem among women in South Asia. (Clinical Trials Registry of India No: CTRI/2017/06/008744; Sri Lanka Clinical Trials Registry No: SLCTR/2017/001; and ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier No: NCT03305939).