Browsing by Author "Kulathunga, K.M.K.N.S."

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A Case Study Review of Strategic Acquisitions of Synergic PLC
    (Staff Development Unit, Faculty of Commerce & Management Studies, University of Kelaniya, 2015) Morawakage, P.S.; Kulathunga, K.M.K.N.S.; Basnayake, W.B.M.D.; Wijesinghe, M.R.P.; Chandrasena, S.M.; Piyananda, S.D.P.
    Synergic Holding PLC initiated operations in 1991 as a software development company. It was incorporated as a private limited company in 1998 and obtained a listing in the Colombo Stock Exchange in June 2011. Soon after the incorporation they became the sole authorized distributor for DELL Computers in Sri Lanka. Gerrys Synergic (Pvt) Ltd started as a joint venture with Gerrys Holdings (Pvt) Ltd in Pakistan, fulfilling Mr. Alok Pathirathne’s (the founder of Synergic Holdings PLC) dream of ‘going global’. Synergic Company’s move towards furniture retail, from IT related activities was the first instance they adopted the diversification strategy. At present the Synergic Holding PLC is rated as one of Sri Lanka’s most energetic and aggressive conglomerates. The diversified key sectors are Information and Communication Technology, Healthcare, Retail, Financial Services, Automobiles and Leisure. This case study specifically underlines the strategic acquisition of Rovel PLC which took place in the year 2014. Rovel PLC initiated its operations in 1989, in a small retail outlet. Today, Rovel’s flagship department store is a 36,000 square foot, lavishly appointed store and it owns 20 other outlets in many strategically important locations. Rovel operates at the top end of the retail fashion market, where it has carved out a niche through a highly focused approach targeted at the upper-middle and higher-income groups, Rovel has maintained its leadership position by providing a modern, world-class retail environment that has become the standard for the South Asian region. Rovel is not only Sri Lanka’s leading fashion brand, but with a wide array of products, it is also Sri Lanka’s only genuine department store. Rovel has achieved the status of an iconic brand with its tireless ability to reinvent itself at regular intervals. The recent acquisition of Rovel PLC by Synergic Holdings has created a major upheaval amongst the business community and the media. One main intention behind the said acquisition was Synergic’s motive of working with Parkson, the largest shareholder of Rovel. However the withdrawal of Parkson from Rovel PLC left Synergic’s efforts futile. Also after the said acquisition, Synergic’s excessive borrowings have resulted with its Fitch Rating being downgraded by two notches. The boards of directors now are contemplating about the survival of the company with its existing structure.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    An Empirical Study on Corporate Ownership Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence from Listed Companies in Sri Lanka
    (Faculty of Commerce and Management Studies, University of Kelaniya, 2015) Chandrasena, S.M.; Kulathunga, K.M.K.N.S.
    Ownership structure, whether it is concentrated or dispersed, is one of the main determinants of organizational performance. Theories of corporate governance insist on dispersed ownership and segregation of ownership and management. In most of the emerging countries a concentrated form of ownership is evident in listed companies. Therefore the objectives of this study are twofold; to investigate whether ownership structure has an impact on firm performance and to examine whether concentrated ownership has an impact on firm performance, in companies listed in Sri Lanka. Researchers have considered a sample of seventy six (76) non-financial listed companies in CSE during the period of 2008 to 2014. A time fixed effect model is applied into the panel regression analysis and a Generalized Least Squares (GLS) regression model is chosen. Findings suggest that a significant relationship exists between ownership structure and firm performance. Empirical evidence further elucidates that institutional ownership has a significant positive relationship with firm performance, which can be justified based on the ‘active monitoring argument’. Significant negative relationship between individual ownership and firm performance can be argued based on ‘manager discouragement argument’. Concentrated ownership too has a significant positive relationship with firm performance, supporting the wellknown agency theory propositions.