Browsing by Author "Mufeena, M.N.F."
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Comparison of clinical and laboratory parameters between Rickettsiosis positive and negative children(Sri Lanka Medical Association, 2013) Premaratna, R.; Karunasekara, K.A.W.; Fernando, M.A.M.; de Silva, L.; Chandrasena, T.G.A.N.; de Silva, H.J.; Miththinda, J.K.N.D.; Mufeena, M.N.F.; Madeena, K.S.K.; Bandara, N.K.B.K.R.G.W.INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Identification of clinical or biochemical parameters that differentiate rickettsioses from other fevers would help in clinical practice to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with childhood rickettsioses. METHODS: Clinical and laboratory parameters of 22 confirmed paediatric rickettsioses (SFG-16/22, ST-5/22, Mixed-1) were compared with those of 24 with fever who were negative for rickettsioses, based on data received by the Rickettsial Disease Diagnostic and Research Laboratory (RDDRL), Faculty of Medicine, University ofKelaniya. Results: Comparisons of clinical and laboratory parameters between rickettsioses vs non-rickettsioses were mean(SD); age in months 56.59 (43.9) vs 78.13 (42.08) (p=0.1); fever duration 9.81 days (4.5) vslO.68 days (8.79) (p-0.68); fever intensity 102.80F (1.03) vs 102.440F (1.23) (p=0.4); fever spikes per day 2.33 (0.67) vs 2.68 (0.75) (p=0.186); headache 12/22 vs 11/24 (p=0.64); body-aches 9/22 vs 9/24 (p-0.52); pain in arms and legs 6/9 vs 7/9 (p=0.5); joint pains 6/22 vs 7/24 (p=O.S9); cough 14/22 vs 9/24 (p=0.0*7); shortness of breath 5/22 vs 2/24 (p=0.19); eschar (all ST) 4/22 vs 0/24 (p=0.02); rash 14/22 vs 14/24 (p=0.69); maculo-papular rash!3/14 vs 12/14 (p=0.91); diarrhoea 4/22 vs 4/24 (p-0.89); lymphadenopathy 7/22 vs 8/24 (p=0.913); spleenl/22 vs 5/24 (p=0.18); total WBC 11.U109/L (4.8) vs 9.8xl09/L (4.8) (p=0.36); N-84.8% (13.8) vs 5.4(2) (p=0.29); ESR IstHr 46.3mm (26.7) vs 81.8mm (10.2) (p=0.37); CRP 42.1mg/dl vs 56.7mg/dl (6.7) (p=0.46); SCOT 51.2iu/L (32.1) vs 248.7iu/L (678) (p=0.43); SGPT 50.2iu/L (51.4) vs 170.7iu/L (404) (p=0.44). CONCLUSIONS: In paediatric patients, no clinical or biochemical parameter could differentiate rickettsioses from other aetiologies. Presence of eschars would help to diagnose scrub typhus. However laboratory confirmation is needed to differentiate SFG from other fevers.Item Development and validation of Sinhala version of the chronic liver disease questionnaire (CLDQ)(Wiley Blackwell Scientific Publications, 2013) Miththinda, J.K.N.D.; Ranawaka, C.; Pathmeswaran, A.; Dassanayake, A.S.; de Alwis, W.R.S.; Mufeena, M.N.F.; Senanayake, S.M.; Niriella, M.A.; de Silva, A.P.; de Silva, H.J.OBJECTIVE: The Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ) is a validated tool measuring the Health Related Quality of Life among cirrhotics. Aim of this study was to develop and validate a Sinhala version of the CLDQ (sCLDQ) and to test its correlation with the degree of liver dysfunction in a cohort of Sri Lankan patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: A standard translation method was used to develop the sCLDQ. Pilot testing was done with relevant cultural and language adaptations. The final version was self-administered to stable CLD patients, together with the WHO Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) validated Sinhala version, for comparison. sCLDQ was re administered 4 weeks later to test internal consistency and reliability. The validation was assessed by Cronabach’s alpha, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Pearson’s correlation coefficient. ANOVA and Pearson’s correlation were used to test correlation with the degree of liver dysfunction. RESULTS: Validation was done with 214 subjects, mean age 55.6 (SD 10.4) years; male 77.6%. Overall Cronabach’s alpha was 0.926. Itra-class correlations varied from 0.431 to 0.912 and all were significant (p 0.000). Retesting was done on a sub-sample of 18 subjects. Test-retest correlation was 0.695 (p 0.008). WHO-BREF was applied on a sub-sample of 48 subjects. There was a significant correlation (Pearson’s r = 0.391; p = 0.004) between sCLDQ and WHOQOL BREF. sCLDQ was significantly associated with MELD (r = −0.13; p = 0.038), MELD Sodium (r = −0.223; p = 0.002), Bilirubin (r = −0.124; p = 0.036), Serum Sodium (r = 0.172; p = 0.009), Serum Albumin (r = 0.201; p = 0.003) and Child grade (f = 3.687; p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: sCLDQ is a reliable and valid tool to assess QoL of Sri Lankan cirrhotics and correlates well with known indices of disease severity.Item Development and validation of sinhala version of the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ) for assessment of quality of life among cirrhotics(Sri Lanka Medical Association, 2012) Ranawaka, C.K.; Pathmeswaran, A.; de Alwis, W.R.S.; Mufeena, M.N.F.; Wijewantha, H.S.; Senanayake, S.M.; Niriella, M.A.; Dassanayake, A.S.; de Silva, A.P.; de Silva, H.J.INTRODUCTION: Chronic liver disease (CLD) has a negative impact on patient quality of life (QOL). The Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ) is a validated tool which measures the Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) among cirrhotics. CLDQ is easy to administer, measures six domains of QOL; abdominal symptoms, fatigue, systemic symptoms, activity, emotional functions and worry. It shows good correlation with severity of CLD. Aims: To develop and validate a Sinhala version of the CLDQ (sCLDQ). METHODS: A standard method of forward and back-translation by bilingual translators was used to develop the sCLDQ. Pilot testing were done with relevant adaptations, considering differences in culture and language. The final version was self-administered to stable CLD patients without significant co-morbidities, together with the WHO BREF Sinhala version (validated for patients of any disease), for comparison. sCLDQ was re-administered 4 weeks later to study its internal consistency and reliability. The sCLDQ validation was assessed by Cronabach's alpha, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Pearson's correlation coefficient RESULTS: Forty eight patients participated in the validation process. The item total correlations of sCLDQ varied from 0.30 to 0.82 (except one item number 0.15). Overall Cronabach's alpha was 0.92. Re-administration of sCLDQ to 15 patients yielded an ICC of 0.54 (p = 0.02). There was a significant correlation (Pearson's r = 0.34; p = 0.03) between sCLDQ and WHO BREF. CONCLUSIONS: sCLDQ was reliable and valid and would be a useful tool to assess QOL of cirrhotic patients in Sri Lanka.Item Development and validation of sinhala version of the chronic liver disease questionnaire (CLDQ) for assessment of quality of life among cirrhotics(Wiley Blackwell Scientific Publications, 2012) Ranawaka, C.K.; Pathmeswaran, A.; Senanayake, S.M.; de Alwis, R.; Mufeena, M.N.F.; Niriella, M.A.; Dassanayake, A.S.; de Silva, A.P.; de Silva, H.J.BACKGROUND AND AIM: Chronic liver disease (CLD) has a negative impact on patient quality of life (QOL). The Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ) is a validated tool which measures the Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) among cirrhotics. CLDQ is easy to administer and measures six domains of QOL; abdominal symptoms, fatigue, systemic symptoms, activity, emotional functions and worry. It shows good correlation with severity of CLD. No tool had been developed previously to asses QOL among CLD patients in Sri Lanka. Aim of this study was to develop and validate a Sinhala version of the CLDQ (sCLDQ). METHODS: A standard method of forward and back-translation by bilingual translators was employed to develop the sCLDQ. Pilot testing was done with relevant linguistic and cultural adaptations. The final version was self-administered to stable CLD patients without significant comorbidities, together with the WHO BREF Sinhala version (a validated QOL assessment tool for any disease), for comparison. sCLDQ was re-administered 4 weeks later to study its internal consistency and reliability. The sCLDQ validation was assessed by Cronabach’s alpha, intraclass correlation coeffi cient (ICC) and Pearson’s correlation coeffi cient. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Forty eight patients participated in the validation process. The item total correlations of sCLDQ varied from 0.30 to 0.82 (except one item, 0.15). Overall Cronabach’s alpha was 0.92. Re-administration of sCLDQ to 15 patients yielded an ICC of 0.54 (p = 0.02). There was a signifi cant correlation (Pearson’s r = 0.34; p = 0.03) between sCLDQ and WHO BREF. Conclusion: sCLDQ was reliable and valid and would be a useful tool to assess QOL among cirrhotic patients in Sri Lanka.Item Validation of Sinhala version of the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ) and evaluation of health related quality of fife among patients with cirrhosis in Sri Lanka(Sri Lanka Medical Association, 2013) Miththinda, J.K.N.D.; Ranawaka, C.K.; Pathmeswaran, A.; Dassanayake, A.S.; de Alwis, W.R.S.; Mufeena, M.N.F.; Senanayake, S.M.; Niriella, M.A.; de Silva, A.P.; de Silva, H.J.AIMS: Our aim was to validate a Sinhala version of the CLDQ (sCLDQ) and to test its correlation with the degree of liver dysfunction in a cohort of Sri Lankan cirrhotics. METHODS: A standard method was used to translate the CLDQ to Sinhala. Pilot testing was done and relevant cultural and language adaptations made. The final version was self-administered to stable chronic liver disease (CLD) patients, together with the WHO Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) validated Sinhala version, for comparison. The sCLDQ was re-administered 4 weeks later to test internal consistency and reliability. The validation was assessed using Cronabach's alpha, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Pearson's correlation coefficient. ANOVA and Pearson's correlation were used to test correlation with the degree of liver dysfunction. RESULTS: Validation was done with 48 subjects, mean age 55.6 (SD 10) years; male 79%. Item total correlations of sCLDQ varied from 0.30-0.82. Overall Cronabach's alpha was 0.92. Re-administration of sCLDQ yielded an ICC of 0.54 (p=0.02). There was a significant correlation between sCLDQ and WHOQOL-BREF (r=0.34; p=0.03). Validated sCLDQ xvas administered to a different cohort of 202 cirrhotics with mean age of 55.3 years (SD 10,5); male 77%; mean duration of cirrhosis 2.7 years (SD 2.9) years. Higher Child class (F=0.000; p-0.017) and hyponatraemia (r=0.2I3; p=0.005) were associated with worse sCLDQ scores. There was no significant association between sCLDQ score and MELD (r=-0.128, p=0.072). CONCLUSIONS: The sCLDQ is a reliable and valid tool to assess QOL of Sri Lankan cirrhotics and it correlates with known indices of disease severity.Item Validation of the Sinhala version of the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire(CLDQ) for assessment of health related quality of life among Sri Lankan cirrhotics(Sri Lanka Medical Association, 2013) Ranawaka, C.K.; Miththinda, J.K.N.D.; Senanayake, S.M.; de Alwis, W.R.S.; Mufeena, M.N.F.; Niriella, M.A.; Dassanayake, A.S.; de Silva, A.P.; Pathmeswaran, A.; de Silva, H.J.OBJECTIVES: The Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ) is a validated tool measuring Health Related Quality of Life among patients with cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to validate a Sinhala version of the CLDQ (sCLDQ) and to test its correlation with the degree of liverdysfunction in a cohort of Sri Lankan patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: A standard translation method was used. Pilot testing was done with relevant cultural and language adaptations. The final version and the WHO Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) validated Sinhala version were administered to patients with chronic lever disease(CLD). sCLDQ was re-administered 4 weeks later to test internal consistency and reliability. The validaty and reliability were assessed by Cronabach's alpha, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Pearson's correlation coefficient. ANOVA and Pearson's correlation were used to assess correlation with the degree of liver dysfunction. RESULTS: Validation was done with 214 participants [mean age 55.6 years (SD 10.4) male 77.6%]. Cronabach's alpha was 0.926. Intra-class correlations varied from 0.431 to 0.912 and all were significant (p< 0.001). Retesting was done on a sub-sample of 18 participants. Test-retest correlation was 0.695 (p = 0.008). WHO-BREF was administered to a sub-sample of 48 subjects. There was a significant correlation (Pearson's r=0.391; p=0.004) between sCLDQ and WHOQOL BREF. sCLDQ was significantly associated with MELD (r=-0.13; p=0.038), MELD sodium (r=-0.223; p=0.002), serum bilirubin (r=-0.124; p=0.036), serum sodium (r=0.172; p=0.009), serum albumin (r=0.201; p=0.003) and Child grade (f=3.687; p=0.027). CONCLUSIONS: CLDQ is a reliable and valid tool to assess quality of life of Sri Lankan patients with cirrhosis and correlates well with known indices of disease severity