Browsing by Author "Premaratne, R."

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5

A Comparative analysis of the outcome of malaria case surveillance strategies in Sri Lanka in the prevention of re-establishment phase
(BioMed Central, 2021) Gunasekera, W.M.K.T.A.W.; Premaratne, R.; Fernando, D.; Munaz, M.; Piyasena, M.G.Y.; Perera, D.; Wickremasinghe, R.; Ranaweera, K.D.N.P.; Mendis, K.
BACKGROUND: Sri Lanka sustained its malaria-free status by implementing, among other interventions, three core case detection strategies namely Passive Case Detection (PCD), Reactive Case Detection (RACD) and Proactive Case Detection (PACD). The outcomes of these strategies were analysed in terms of their effectiveness in detecting malaria infections for the period from 2017 to 2019. METHODS: Comparisons were made between the surveillance methods and between years, based on data obtained from the national malaria database and individual case reports of malaria patients. The number of blood smears examined microscopically was used as the measure of the volume of tests conducted. The yield from each case detection method was calculated as the proportion of blood smears which were positive for malaria. Within RACD and PACD, the yield of sub categories of travel cohorts and spatial cohorts was ascertained for 2019. RESULTS: A total of 158 malaria cases were reported in 2017-2019. During this period between 666,325 and 725,149 blood smears were examined annually. PCD detected 95.6 %, with a yield of 16.1 cases per 100,000 blood smears examined. RACD and PACD produced a yield of 11.2 and 0.3, respectively. The yield of screening the sub category of travel cohorts was very high for RACD and PACD being 806.5 and 44.9 malaria cases per 100,000 smears, respectively. Despite over half of the blood smears examined being obtained by screening spatial cohorts within RACD and PACD, the yield of both was zero over all three years. CONCLUSIONS: The PCD arm of case surveillance is the most effective and, therefore, has to continue and be further strengthened as the mainstay of malaria surveillance. Focus on travel cohorts within RACD and PACD should be even greater. Screening of spatial cohorts, on a routine basis and solely because people are resident in previously malarious areas, may be wasteful, except in situations where the risk of local transmission is very high, or is imminent. These findings may apply more broadly to most countries in the post-elimination phase. KEYWORDS: Active case detection; Malaria case surveillance; Malaria in Sri Lanka; Passive case detection; Prevention of re-establishment of malaria; Proactive case detection; Reactive case detection; Spatial cohorts; Travel cohorts; Yield.
Epidemiological profile of imported malaria cases in the prevention of reestablishment phase in Sri Lanka
(Taylor & Francis, 2022) Dharmawardena, P.; Premaratne, R.; Wickremasinghe, R.; Mendis, K.; Fernando, D.
ABSTRACT: Sri Lanka reported the last case of indigenous malaria in October 2012, and received malaria-free certification from WHO in September 2016. Malaria cases have since, shifted from indigenous to imported, and the country remains receptive and vulnerable to malaria. A case-based epidemiological study was conducted on all imported malaria cases reported in the country in 2015 and 2016 with the aim of profiling imported malaria to improve the effectiveness of the surveillance and case management system for malaria. Data were obtained from case reports of the Anti Malaria Campaign, hospital records and laboratory registers. Over the 2 years, 77 imported malaria infections were diagnosed in 54 Sri Lankans and 23 foreign nationals. A majority of the infections were reported among males (93%) in the age group of 21-50 years (85.8%), and all were recent travelers overseas. Most patients were detected by passive case detection, but 10% of cases were detected by Active Case Detection. Only 25% of patients were diagnosed within 3 days of the onset of symptoms. In 32% of patients, the diagnosis was delayed by more than 10 days after the onset of symptoms. Plasmodium falciparum infections manifested significantly earlier after arrival in Sri Lanka than did P.vivax infections. The majority of patients (74%) were diagnosed in the Western Province, which was not endemic for malaria. A third of patients were diagnosed in the private sector. The shift in the epidemiology of malaria infection from before to after elimination has implications for preventing the reestablishment of malaria. KEYWORDS: Imported malaria; case surveillance; delayed diagnosis; epidemiology; prevention of reestablishment; receptivity; risk factors.
Malaria elimination does not cost more than malaria control: Sri Lanka a case in point
(BioMed Central, London, 2022) Mendis, K.; Wickremasinghe, R.; Premaratne, R.
Background: Malaria was endemic in Sri Lanka for centuries and was eliminated in 2012. It is widely assumed that the costs of elimination are generally greater than that of control. The costs of malaria elimination in Sri Lanka with that of malaria control in the past using periods in which starting transmission dynamics were similar were compared. Methods: The expenditure of the Anti-Malaria Campaign (AMC), total and by budget category, during 2002-2010 is compared with that of malaria control during the period 1980-1989, using regression analyses and the Mann Whitney U statistic. Results: The expenditure on malaria control and malaria elimination was similar ranging from 21 to 45 million USD per year when adjusted for inflation. In both periods, external funding for the malaria progamme constituted around 24% of the total budget; during the control phase in the 1980s, external funds came from bilateral agencies and were disbursed in accordance with government budget guidelines. In the elimination phase in the 2000s, most of external funding was from the Global Fund and had flexibility of disbursement. In the 1980s, most funds were expended on commodities-insecticides, diagnostics and medicines and their delivery; in the elimination phase, they were spent on programme management, human resources, technical assistance and monitoring and evaluation; monitoring and evaluation was not a budget line in the 1980s. Although the cost per case of malaria was considerably higher during the elimination phase than in the control phase, expenditure was not on individual cases but on general systems strengthening. Conclusion: Malaria elimination in Southeast Asia may not require more funding than malaria control. But sustained funding for an agile programme with flexibility in fund utilization and improved efficiencies in programme management with stringent monitoring and evaluation appears to be critically important.
Role of a dedicated support group in retaining malaria-free status of Sri Lanka.
(New Delhi : National Institute of Malaria Research, 2019) Datta, R.; Mendis, K.; Wickremasinghe, R.; Premaratne, R.; Fernando, D.; Parry, J.; Rolfe, B.
No Abstract Available
Technical and operational underpinnings of malaria elimination from Sri Lanka
(BioMed Central, 2019) Premaratne, R.; Wickremasinghe, R.; Ranaweera, D.; Gunasekera, W.M.K.T.A.W.; Hevawitharana, M.; Pieris, L.; Fernando, D.; Mendis, K.
Malaria was eliminated from Sri Lanka in 2012, and the country received WHO-certification in 2016. The objective of this paper is to describe the epidemiology of malaria elimination in Sri Lanka, and the key technical and operational features of the elimination effort, which may have been central to achieving the goal, even prior to schedule, and despite an ongoing war in parts of the country. Analysis of information and data from the Anti Malaria Campaign (AMC) of Sri Lanka during and before the elimination phase, and the experiences of the author(s) who directed and/or implemented the elimination programme or supported it form the basis of this paper. The key epidemiological features of malaria on the path to elimination included a steady reduction of case incidence from 1999 onwards, and the simultaneous elimination of both Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax. Against the backdrop of a good health infrastructure the AMC, a specialized programme within the Ministry of Health operated through a decentralized provincial health system to implement accepted strategies for the elimination of malaria. Careful planning combined with expertise on malaria control at the Central level with dedicated staff at all levels at the Centre and on the ground in all districts, for several years, was the foundation of this success. The stringent implementation of anti-relapse treatment for P. vivax through a strong collaboration with the military in whose cadres most of the malaria cases were clustered in the last few years of transmission would have supported the relatively rapid elimination of P. vivax. A robust case and entomological surveillance and investigation system described here enabled a highly focused approach to delivering interventions leading to the interruption of transmission.