Browsing by Author "Ranaweera, K.D.N.P."

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Chemoprophylaxis for malaria: A costly approach to prevent re-establishment of malaria in Sri Lanka
    (Sri Lanka Medical Association, 2021) Muzrif, M.M.; Mendis, K.N.; Weerasekera, C.J.; Karunaratna, S.; Wickremasinghe, R.; Ranaweera, K.D.N.P.; Fernando, S.D.
    Introduction and Objectives As a measure to prevent the re-establishment of malaria in the country, the Anti Malaria Campaign (AMC) provides antimalarial chemoprophylactic medicines for up to six months free-of-charge to anyone travelling to malaria endemic countries. The objective of this study was to identify the trends of chemoprophylaxis prescription by the AMC and the costs involved. Methods Data were extracted from the national malaria database regarding the number of travellers issued with antimalarial chemoprophylactic medicines during the years 2017-2019. The amount spent for purchase of antimalarial chemoprophylactic medicines was determined. Results Over the three year period the overall number of individuals issued with antimalarial chemoprophylaxis increased (1714 in 2017, 2600 in 2018 and 3053 in 2019). The number of travellers obtaining chemoprophylaxis for malaria when travelling to African countries reduced, while the number travelling to India increased. The cost incurred to the Government of Sri Lanka to purchase mefloquine and doxycycline for prophylaxis was USD 45,755, while the cost to purchase CQ over the three year period for prophylaxis alone was USD 310,714. The total cost incurred to purchase the prophylactic antimalarials have also increased significantly over the three year period, the cost being eleven times higher in 2019 than in 2017. Conclusion Chemoprophylaxis against malaria remains an important strategy to sustain the malaria elimination status in Sri Lanka, and the cost of this intervention is considerable and increasing over time. The local production of anti malarials might be warranted if it will reduce the cost of chemoprophylaxis.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A Comparative analysis of the outcome of malaria case surveillance strategies in Sri Lanka in the prevention of re-establishment phase
    (BioMed Central, 2021) Gunasekera, W.M.K.T.A.W.; Premaratne, R.; Fernando, D.; Munaz, M.; Piyasena, M.G.Y.; Perera, D.; Wickremasinghe, R.; Ranaweera, K.D.N.P.; Mendis, K.
    BACKGROUND: Sri Lanka sustained its malaria-free status by implementing, among other interventions, three core case detection strategies namely Passive Case Detection (PCD), Reactive Case Detection (RACD) and Proactive Case Detection (PACD). The outcomes of these strategies were analysed in terms of their effectiveness in detecting malaria infections for the period from 2017 to 2019. METHODS: Comparisons were made between the surveillance methods and between years, based on data obtained from the national malaria database and individual case reports of malaria patients. The number of blood smears examined microscopically was used as the measure of the volume of tests conducted. The yield from each case detection method was calculated as the proportion of blood smears which were positive for malaria. Within RACD and PACD, the yield of sub categories of travel cohorts and spatial cohorts was ascertained for 2019. RESULTS: A total of 158 malaria cases were reported in 2017-2019. During this period between 666,325 and 725,149 blood smears were examined annually. PCD detected 95.6 %, with a yield of 16.1 cases per 100,000 blood smears examined. RACD and PACD produced a yield of 11.2 and 0.3, respectively. The yield of screening the sub category of travel cohorts was very high for RACD and PACD being 806.5 and 44.9 malaria cases per 100,000 smears, respectively. Despite over half of the blood smears examined being obtained by screening spatial cohorts within RACD and PACD, the yield of both was zero over all three years. CONCLUSIONS: The PCD arm of case surveillance is the most effective and, therefore, has to continue and be further strengthened as the mainstay of malaria surveillance. Focus on travel cohorts within RACD and PACD should be even greater. Screening of spatial cohorts, on a routine basis and solely because people are resident in previously malarious areas, may be wasteful, except in situations where the risk of local transmission is very high, or is imminent. These findings may apply more broadly to most countries in the post-elimination phase. KEYWORDS: Active case detection; Malaria case surveillance; Malaria in Sri Lanka; Passive case detection; Prevention of re-establishment of malaria; Proactive case detection; Reactive case detection; Spatial cohorts; Travel cohorts; Yield.