Repository logo
Communities & Collections
All of DSpace
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Rathnayake, M.M."

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Complications of loop ileostomy and ileostomy closure and their implications for extended enterostomal therapy: A prospective clinical audit
    (Pergamon Press, 2008) Rathnayake, M.M.; Kumarage, S.K.; Wijesuriya, S.R.E.; Munasinghe, B.N.L.; Ariyaratne, M.H.J.; Deen, K.I.
    INTRODUCTION: Patients who have a temporary loop ileostomy have impaired quality of life. Complications associated with a loop ileostomy orileostomy closure will impair patients' quality of life further and require extended enterostomal therapy. We performed a prospective audit of loop ileostomy to ascertain the nature of the workload that may be created with ileostomy-related complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and forty patients (67 males, 73 females, median age 50 years, range 5-90 years) who received a temporary loop ileostomy were analysed after completion of proformas on a prospective basis between 1999 and 2006. RESULTS: Operation was performed for rectal cancer 100 (71%), familial adenomatous polyposis 14 (10%), ulcerative colitis 21 (15%) and for trauma or Hirchsprung's disease 5 (3%). Complications of loop ileostomy were: retraction 1 (0.7%), ileostomy flux 11 (8%), stomal prolapse 1 (0.7%), parastomal hernia 1 (0.7%), paraileostomy abscess 4 (3%) and severe skin excoriation 9 (6%). The loop ileostomy was reversed in 117 (83%) at a median (range) of 13 weeks (1-60). Ileostomy closure-related complications were: small bowel fistula 1 (0.9%), small bowel obstruction 5 (4.3%) and a stitch sinus in 1 (0.9%). Five women developed recto-vaginal fistula (n=3; 2.6%), pouch-vaginal fistula (n=1; 0.9%) and pouch-anal fistula (n=1; 0.9%) that required extended enterostomal therapy, after loop ileostomy reversal. CONCLUSION: Nineteen percent of patients following creation of a loop ileostomy and 10.5% of patients after reversal of the ileostomy requiredextended enterostomal care by a specialized enterostomal therapist, which supported resumption of a normal life.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify