Repository logo
Communities & Collections
All of DSpace
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Sanjeewa, R."

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Public knowledge, practices and perceptions on typhus fevers in Southern Sri Lanka
    (Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2022) Liyanage, A.; Chandrasena, N.; Gunathilaka, N.; Sanjeewa, R.; Premaratna, R.
    Objective: To assess public knowledge, practices and perceptions on typhus fevers in Sri Lanka. Methods: A descriptive study was done in four selected typhus- prone areas in Southern Sri Lanka. A mixed-method was employed using face-to-face interviews and questionnaire-based surveys among confirmed cases of typhus and at-risk populations, respectively. Frequencies, percentages, and means were used to characterize socio-demography and evaluate disease awareness. Results: The lay terms for typhus fevers reported in the studied region were “peacock fever”, “tick fever” and “bird fever”. A total of 499 subjects participated [mean±SD, (45±16) years] in the questionnaire-based survey, and 13.6% (n=68) reported past experience of typhus fever, 1.2% (n=6) identified the disease as “typhus” while 58.7% (n=293) and 11.8% (n=59) knew it as ‘peacock fever’ and ‘tick fever’, respectively. The etiological agent was unknown to 95.2% (n=475), but 53.5% ((n=267) were aware that it was vector-borne. Fever (57.3%, n=286), eschar (35.7%, n=178), headache (22.0%, n=267) and myalgia (19.2%, n=96) were identified as key symptoms. Past disease experience was significantly associated with higher awareness of the main disease symptoms (fever: χ2=15.713, P<0.001; headache: χ2=19.447, P<0.001; lymphadenopathy: Fisher’s exact test, P=0.023; eschar: χ2=12.049, P<0.001). None knew of any disease prevention methods. Participants with a past history of typhus fever had sought treatment at state hospitals (55.9%, 38/68) and private sector hospitals (5.9%, 4/68). Conclusions: Public awareness on preventive practices for typhus fevers was rare among the participants though vector-borne aspect was known to many. Clinical disease awareness was deficient among those without past experience of typhus fever. Community sensitization on vector avoidance strategies is highly recommended.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Visualization of dihedral groups and their subgroups
    (12th Annual Research Symposium, University of Kelaniya, 2011) Silva, H.I.R.U.; Kumara, K.K.W.A.S.; Sanjeewa, R.
    A picture may be worth a thousand words; therefore most of the mathematicians use images to demonstrate mathematical concepts like Riemann sums, Topological surfaces, graphs, etc. Then why do they not use images to demonstrate groups as well? This is where the area of visualization of group theory comes into play. For this purpose, the most significant method was invented by the British mathematician Arthur Cayley and called it Cayley diagrams. There are other visualization techniques such as multiplication tables, object with symmetries, etc. However, a Cayley diagram has two major advantages compared to other methods. First, it clearly represents a group as a set of elements and the second is by taking the group‟s generators into account. Cayley diagrams fully illustrate the interaction among the elements of a group. In our work, we mainly focused on drawing diagrams of Dihedral groups ( ) to illustrate order of each element, inverse of every element and their positions in the diagrams. Furthermore, we determined all subgroups without any calculations. In this study, we divided n in to two cases as odd and even. We have used the Dihedral group of order 2n. Using the idea in Cayley diagrams, we have drawn a diagram for ., for which we use two n-gons one within the other. Starting from the identity element, we give the correct positions for all the elements of . Inner n-gon contains order 2 elements only and the outer n-gon contains the other elements with different orders with an interesting relationship between the divisors of n. After drawing the required diagram, we have discussed the orders of all the elements of just by looking at it. Also, we can find the positions and inverse of each element by folding the diagram through its symmetric axis. The number of subgroups of a Dihedral group is given by the formula, ( ) ( ), where ( ) is the number of divisors of n and ( )is the sum of the divisors of n. Using the relation in between the divisors of n and the order of each element of , we found all subgroups of just by looking at the diagram. Our main aim was to find a graphical method which is easier than using formulas to explain Dihedral group of any order. We concluded that any given Dihedral group , the order of each element, inverses of each element and their positions and all its subgroups can be derived easily by visualization through an appropriate Cayley diagram.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify