Repository logo
Communities & Collections
All of DSpace
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Shashikala, H.P.L.W."

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Age Factor in Second Language Acquisition
    (Department of Linguistics, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka, 2016) Shashikala, H.P.L.W.
    The notion that there is a biologically determined period set for language acquisition is referred to as the Critical Period Hypothesis. This critical period which is thought to be sometime between age five and puberty has been the subject of long term debate. This study examines the impact of age on learners‟ second language acquisition with a focus on non-native speakers of English at undergraduate level. The sample consists of eighty students studying in the first academic year at the University of Sri Jayewardenepura and both qualitative and quantitative data have been collected from the sample. The first phase of the study involves a questionnaire administered to the selected subjects and in order to validate answers of the questionnaire, a structured interview is carried out. The second phase involves the assessment of their reading, listening, speaking and writing skills and the final phase involves a comparison between the age and amount of exposure to English during these students‟ pre-puberty period and the level of proficiency which they have shown when their second language skills are tested. The findings promote age as affective in second language acquisition. This study provides strong empirical evidence to support the assumption that learners can learn a language with no difficulty up to a certain age after which the language learning abilities decline because the plasticity of a child‟s brain is lost at puberty. Precisely, cognitive immaturity is the best for second language learning not maturity. This research challenges the argument which some researchers hold that similarities between children and adults mastering a second language are greater than differences. Therefore, it is highly recommended that a target language is introduced to children at a very early stage of their life. It is hoped that this research will spur more in depth studies in the area of second language acquisition. Further, it is strongly believed that extensive use and exposure to the language being learnt can make a positive impact on learning. It is also recommended that similar studies are conducted with a large number of students in order to draw generalisations regarding the said subject matter. Further, substantial future research can focus on other factors identified as affective in second language acquisition.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A case-study of the first language interference in students' writing in English as a second language
    (2014) Shashikala, H.P.L.W.
    It is commonly known that a child or an adult learning a second language (L2) is different from a child acquiring a first language (Ll). This study attempts to analyse and describe the syntactic features of Ll interference in the writing of L2 with specific reference to the interference of Sinhala in English. The most frequent syntactic errors in the writing of fifty Sinhala speaking undergraduate learners of English are categorized under Larsen-Freeman and Long's (1991) classification of learner errors. The findings reveal that students are likely to make errors of syntax when differences exist between their Ll and L2 while the similarities have contributed to the accurate production of English. The questionnaire to the sample and interviews with L2 teachers reveal that they think in Sinhala and then transfer everything into English. Further, it is revealed that all errors cannot be attributed to L I interference. They are a result of the false hypotheses formed concerning their L2 with the limited exposure they have had. This study will help many L2 learners and teachers of English around the world to identify frequent interference errors in writing and to develop strategies to overcome them. Also, L2 learners should be encouraged to create hypotheses concerning L2 and test them constantly. Importantly, L should be introduced together with one's LI to avoid interference and comparative studies of the syntax of Sin ha la and English should be encouraged at school level. This will enable students to gain a deep understanding of possible negative Ll transfer. In addition, studies can be carried out to seek the kinds of influence caused by Sinhala phonology, morphology and semantics on L2 acquisition.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify