Browsing by Author "Wijewardana, A.S."

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Patterns of phonological errors in the phonemic clusters in Sri Lankan English
    (University of Kelaniya, 2015) Wijewardana, A.S.
    This study investigates whether problems in pronunciation related to consonant clusters of thelanguage learners which have been overlooked over the years as random errors are indeed random. Specifically, this research questions if the problems in pronunciation related to consonant clusters in Sri Lankan English are results of the interference of the learners’ first language, Sinhala. Furthermore, it identifies about seven patterns of the errors and compares them with similar errors among other speakers from different language backgrounds who also learn English as a second language. This study aims to address the issues arising on account of teachers in secondary education who generally ignore such challenges and the gatekeepers of Sri Lankan English whose identification of speakers with such pronunciation errors as speakers of ‘not pot English’, which can create social barriers. Moreover, the features of the cluster deviation which can also be found among pronunciation problems of other New Englishes suggest that it is justifiable to view it as a learner problem common to many second language speakers. The research is primarily based on phonological data gathered from the interviews of fifty (50) adult participants in 2013 and 2014.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    The issue of equality in Sri Lankan English
    (Book of Abstracts, Annual Research Symposium 2014, 2014) Wijewardana, A.S.
    Sri Lankan English, the variety of English spoken by Sri Lankans including many bilinguals, deviates from Standard British English. ?Gatekeepers� of Sri Lankan English, a fraction of Sri Lankan academic populace recognize a variety of Sri Lankan English as the ?standard dialect� and disdain other variations as inferior ?non-standard dialects�. Absurdly, they argue about the number of dialects in Sri Lankan English regardless of the fact that SLE as it is a non-native variety of English language could not possess dialects. The criteria they follow in setting the ?standards� are vague and unjust. In fact, they tend to overlook the most common practices as deviations, label them as ?not-pot English� and ironically ignore the deviations in SSLE from SBE so that their social prestige may prolong and make a dramatic plea for international recognition for the variety of English they promote.