ICAM-2017

Permanent URI for this collectionhttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/17521

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    HOW SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING HELPS TO RETAIN BRAND EQUITY DURING PRODUCT CRISIS
    (Department of Marketing Management, University of Kelaniya,Sri Lanka., 2017) Amin, H.; Javaid, K.; Zafar, F.
    The main objective of this study is to explore how social media marketing help brands when brands facings crises. Brand equity is a priceless asset of companies. We formulate that Social media is one of the powerful tools for creating brand equity of business. A research shows that mostly owners of different businesses say that use of social media do miracles for their businesses. Social media consists of online web interactive tools such as Facebook, YouTube, Google plus, Twitter, Snap chat, Blogs, whats app, imo Etc. Through these tools companies interact with their customers to maintain positive relations with them and to become more close to customers. To support our research we use case study of Maggi brand in India. In order to accomplish the objective of the study we use Brand Asset Valuator model. The findings of our research shows that social media has positive effect on brand equity during crisis. We also find that where the social media services are not available there are less chances of brand improvement and it has negative effects on brand loyalty and brand equity.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    DO BRANDS MATTER IN BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS MARKETING? A QUALITATIVE INVESTIGATION OF B2B BRANDING PRACTICES.
    (Department of Marketing Management, University of Kelaniya,Sri Lanka., 2017) Mishra, S.S.; Sharma, P.
    For major part of 20th century, prevailing paradigm in B2B research considered branding as less relevant. Most researches adapted B2C brand equity models to explain B2B branding. Though post 2000 onwards the subject received significant academic interest, there is lack of consensus about the relevance of brand information in organizational buying decisions. To address this, the present study aims to explore: 1) whether “brand” is an important decision criteria in B2B buying, 2) sources of brand equity for B2B firms and 3) key differentiators in building B2B brands. We conducted indepth interviews among 56 distributors and 65 customers of B2B products across 13 industry sectors followed by content analysis of all interviews. The analysis shows a variance in organizational buyers’ sensitivity towards brands depending upon: 1) type of application (criticality) of purchased product/ technology and 2) relevance of ingredient branding. Accordingly, buyers can be categorized into high and low brand sensitive groups. Secondly, just like consumer brands, B2B brand equity has both functional and psychological components. Functional component includes product availability, reliability, credit facility (payment terms) and after sales service. Psychological component includes distributor’s brand value, manufacturer’s origin and market visibility. Lastly, product customization, focus on margins and role of channel partners helps to build B2B brands. Managerially, results encourage firms to adopt a multi-faceted strategy (logistics, contract/ payment terms, product customization and innovation in its offerings) to increase brand value. By systematically examining the key deliberations of B2B buyers, this study offers a basis for market segmentation and adds knowledge to the field of B2B brand research.