IPRC - 2019

Permanent URI for this collectionhttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/20881

Browse

Author: search.filters.author.Gunawardene, Y.I.N.S.

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Evaluation of the Pyrethroid Resistance based on Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel (VGSC) Mutations in Aedes aegypti populations of Colombo, Gampaha and Kandy Districts in Sri Lanka
    (International Postgraduate Research Conference 2019, Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka, 2019) Ranathunge, T.; Udayanga, L.; Sarasija, S.; Karunathilaka, S.; Nawarathne, S.; Rathnarajah, H.; Dulficar, F.F.; Shafi, F.N.; Dassanayake, R.S.; Gunawardene, Y.I.N.S.
    Many countries focus on chemical based vector control strategies to restrict the disease transmissions, where pyrethroid insecticides are widely used as the first line of defense against Ae. aegypti. However, the constant use of insecticides have proven to induce insecticide resistance in mosquitoes. The knockdown resistance (kdr) occurs due to mutations in the Voltage Sensitive Sodium Channel (VSSC) or mutations in the Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel (VGSC), coded by the VSSC gene. Only three kdr mutations namely, the V1016G, S989P, and F1534C have been confirmed as commonly occurring amino acid substitutions among mosquito populations in Southeast Asia. Therefore, to extend this observation, current study was conducted to evaluate the prevalence of V1016G and F1534C mutations among Ae. aegypti mosquito populations in three different geographical regions of Sri Lanka. Immature (both pupae and larvae) stages of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes were collected from Colombo, Gampaha and Kandy districts from March to December 2018 and samples were transported to the Molecular Medicine Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya. A total of 855 Ae. aegypti larvae were collected from all districts and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for molecular genotyping of mutations was performed for collected all Ae. aegypti larvae (III instar), to identify the prevalence of kdr mutations in the three Ae. aegypti populations. The frequencies of the resistant and susceptible kdr alleles were determined by using the Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium for each of the point mutation. The Ae. aegypti populations from Colombo, Gampha and Kandy districts showed 40.07% (123/307), 39.58% (114/288) and 19.58% (47/240) of V1016G and F1534C mutations, respectively. The wild type (RR) genotype remained predominant within all the three districts, whereas the homogenous (SS) mutation genotype occurred only in minority. Further, the F1534C was predominant in Ae. aegypti populations of all districts. Among the kdr mutation population, heterogeneous genotyping (RS) for both V1016G and F1534C was prominent, while SS genotyping for V1016G mutation was not observed in the Kandy district. The findings clearly denote that long-term insecticide applications and multiple use of pyrethroids has led to the progression of insecticide resistance among local Ae. aegypti populations. Therefore, evaluation of the prevalence levels of these kdr mutations highlights the necessity for shifting towards novel vector control strategies
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Assessment of Possible Risk Factors Affecting Transmission of Dengue in the District of Gampaha Based on Reported Dengue Cases
    (International Postgraduate Research Conference 2019, Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka, 2019) Perera, E.H.L.; Viswakula, S.; Gunawardene, Y.I.N.S.; Subasinghe, U.; Hapugoda, M.D.
    Dengue is a fast spreading arboviral infection transmitted by the bite of infected females of Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus) and Ae. albopictus (Skuse). According to the Epidemiology Unit, the second highest number of dengue cases is reported in the District of Gampaha, Sri Lanka over past ten years. Objective of this study was to investigate the entomological and socio-economic risk factors affecting transmission of dengue in laboratory-confirmed dengue case reported stations in the District of Gampaha. Laboratory confirmed positive dengue patients (n=100) by dengue NS1 antigen test during the period of June, 2018-August, 2019 were selected. Entomological surveillance was conducted by visiting to each patient within one week of notification of a positive case. For the collection of socio-economic data, an interviewer-administrated questionnaire was used. Adult Aedes mosquito samples collected using a back-pack aspirator showed, 98.64% (73/74) of Ae. albopictus and 1.35% (1/74) of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes. Larval collection using standard larval surveillance techniques showed 92.96% (185/199) and 7.04% (14/199) of Ae. albopictus and Ae.aegypti larvae respectively. The highest House Index (55.17%-16/29), Container Index (28.89%-13/45) and Breteau Index (44.83%-13/29) were reported in the month of June, 2019. The major Aedes breeding place was identified as plastic buckets/barrels (48.6%-84/173) that being used to discard waste. Piped borne water (88%-88/100) was the major water source of the house-holds. Water source of tube well (9%-9/100) was the next popular water source and 66.67%(6/9) of tube wells were positive breeding places for Aedes larvae. Average homestead of the premises of dengue patients was 16.14 perches. From the 100 dengue cases, 67 cases were from middle of town areas, while 2 were from rural areas. Vegetation coverage of the 78% (78/100) house-holds were grass, bushes and small trees and 3% (3/100) house-holds didn’t have any vegetation coverage. The major mosquito prevention method was usage of mosquito nets (54%-54/100) and among dengue patients 7% (7/100) of dengue patients weren’t using any mosquito prevention method. High density of Ae. albopictus mosquitoes, was reported although Ae. aegypti is the major vector of dengue. Therefore, it is required to draw more attention about the Ae. albopictus breeding sites in dengue control programmes. Participants from the study sites were well aware about the disease but still there is a lack of knowledge on breeding sites and vector control methods. Drawbacks in the waste disposal methods, lack of cleanliness in gardens, unplanned water sources and neglecting preventive actions could be considered as the possible risk factors.