1st ICARE Student's Conference - 2015
Permanent URI for this collectionhttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/10239
Browse
4 results
Search Results
Item The empirical relationship between board size and firm performance of listed companies in Sri Lanka(Department of Accountancy, University of Kelaniya, 2015) Weerakkodi, W.A.S.L.A many studies investigate to the link between board size and firm performance in listed companies in Sri Lanka. The evidence on this area is very thin in Sri Lanka being a developing countries. The structure and size of the board and its impact on the performance of the firm is one of the most discussed issues of corporate governance. Board size, gender, duality, education, board age and Independent were the board structure variables, and ROA and ROE were the measurement device of firm Performance. Good corporate governance practices are regarded as important in reducing risk for investors, attracting investment capital and improving the performance of companies. Sri Lanka does not have large number of studies on corporate governance issues. Therefore, these kinds of studies on corporate governance issues will help to improve the corporate governance practice in Sri Lanka. Therefore, this study will provide a new perspective in studying the relationship between board size and firm performance. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between board size and firm performance in Sri Lanka for the extent of compliance of the CBP recommendations by the companies. Further, to investigate the relationship between the CEO duality and firm performance, to investigate the relationship between proportion of non-executive directors and firm performance.Item The effects of corporate governance on firms’ credit ratings(Department of Accountancy, University of Kelaniya, 2015) Karunarathne, R.M.H.L.We investigate whether firms that possess strong corporate governance benefit from higher credit ratings relative to firms with weak governance. A firm’s credit rating reflects a rating agency’s opinion of an entity’s overall creditworthiness and its capacity to satisfy its financial obligations Credit agencies are concerned with governance because weak governance can impair a firm’s financial position and leave debt stakeholders vulnerable to losses To structure our analysis, we adopt a framework developed by Standard & Poor’s for assessing firms’ corporate governance structures and practices. In the case of Sri Lanka that have thoroughly validity because of investors will not be satisfy with the week financial position to invest of the firms. Therefor this has a practical validity to the firm to maintain their financial stability in order to satisfy investor’s preference. So as I develop this to exhibit what kind of validity that the firm has to the corporate governance on firm’s credit ratings. Rather I try to come up with the sensible area of this topic in order to give a clear and feasible view of the topic.Item Impact of ownership structure on firm capital structure(Department of Accountancy, University of Kelaniya, 2015) Wijewadhana, H.S.S.The ownership of the company is more important because it more impact viruses area in the business and defer each one Which of these forms is right for your business depends on the type of business you run, how many owners it has, and its financial situation. No one choice suits every business: Business owners have to pick the structure that best meets their needs. This article introduces several of the most important factors to consider, including One of the most important decisions you will make about your company involves its ownership structure The relationship between ownership structure, capital structure and firm performance is far from being unambiguous. Traditional literature highlights that agency problems between managers and shareholders may reduce the leverage ratio below the optimum level, in an attempt to ensure the continued viability of the firm. Jensen and Meckling, (1976) however argue that introduction of managerial share ownership may reduce these agency problems, thus aligning the interests of managers and shareholders.1 Brailsford et al.(2002) have gone further to suggest that the This research is aimed at determining the relationship capital structure while the impact of this relationship on value of the firm using the panel data of selected large non-financial firms will also be investigated. A contrasting relationship was observed between capital structure and the firm’s performance while firm’s capital structure was dominated by short term leverage. Leverage was negatively related to return on assets, number of board meetings and the board size while it was positively related to board composition. It was also observed that firm’s performance was positively related to leverage, number of board meetings and board size while it was negatively related to board composition.Item Corporate governance and company performance(Department of Accountancy, University of Kelaniya, 2015) Dehipegedara, B.Corporate governance and its impact to the company performance are much debated areas. In the past incidental research has shown significant relationship between various corporate governance features and corporate performance. Good corporate governance is effect to the lower risk of the investors, attaching more investments and improving the performance of companies. And also agency theory suggested that a better governed firm should have better performance and higher valuation due to lower agency cost. For example, better governed U.S. firms have higher Return On Equity and higher Return On Assets.(Gompers, Ishii, and Metrick (2003)).However impact of corporate governance is vary between developing countries and developed countries. This study examines the relationship between corporate governance features and company performance in Sri Lanka. Some of corporate governance variables are Board size, Proportion of non-executive directors, leadership style and Board committees and ROE and ROA can be used as Performance measures. The selected sample is 20 listed firms from top 25 listed companies in the business today top 25 2012- 2013. Data collection methodology is secondary sources. Data will be obtained by Annual reports. Data will be analyzed by using SPSS model to obtain quantitative measures of descriptive statistics, regression analysis and correlation. The importance of this analysis is, it provides the evidence to find the positive relationship between Board sizes, Board committee, Non-executive directors’ impact, leadership structure firm performance which results in higher return.