IPRC - 2018
Permanent URI for this collectionhttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/19163
Browse
6 results
Search Results
Item Analysis of antibiotic sensitivity pattern of clinically significant Staphylococcus aureus at a Base Hospital, Sri Lanka(19th Conference on Postgraduate Research, International Postgraduate Research Conference 2018, Faculty of Graduate Studies,University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka, 2018) Wijesooriya, L.I.; Jayawardana, G.P.C.; de Silva, S.H.N.A.INTRODUCTION: Staphylococcus aureus. is a major organism that causes skin and soft tissue infections. Moreover, it causes an array of other infections. It is treated with flucloxacillin/cloxacillin. However, a significant proportion of S. aureus has developed resistance to flucloxacillin/cloxacillin; hence, they are termed as MRSA. Though MRSA is likely to present in hospital settings, it has crept to the community as well. Accordingly, the number of MRSA infections is increasing.OBJECTIVE: To analyze theantibiotic sensitivity (ABST) pattern of clinicallysignificant S. aureus. METHOD: A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conductedover one year from 01/08/2017 to 31/07/2018involving patients infectedwith S. aureus in Base Hospital, Wathupitiwala. Demographic & clinical data & ABST results were analyzed. ABST (John Stokes method) was performed for chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, fusidic acid, linezolid, co-trimoxazole, gentamicin, clindamycin, teicoplanin & vancomycin. MRSA was identified using cefoxitin disc. The ABST pattern of MSSA was compared with that of MRSA. Statistical analysis was done via the R programming language (level of significance P<0.05). RESULTS: Of 210 patients,48 % (101/210) were males while 52% (109/210) were females. In study cohort,88.1% (185/210) was inpatients & the rest (11.9% - (25/210)) was outpatients. Of the isolated S. aureus, 42.9% (90/210) were from pus, 14.8% (31/210) from blood, 29.5% (62/210) from sputum & 12.4% (26/210) from urine. As per ABST, 69.1% (145/210) was MRSA & 31% (65/210) was MSSA. Sensitivity of MSSA was 84.6% (11/13) for chloramphenicol, 62.3% (33/53) for gentamicin, 55.8% (29/52) for ciprofloxacin, 68.9% (31/45) for clindamycin, 45.7% (21/46) for erythromycin, 84.2%(16/19) for nitrofurantoin, 69.2%(27/39) for fusidic acid, 92.1%(35/38) for linezolid, 74.6%(41/55) for co-trimoxazole, 84.6%(33/39) for teicoplanin & 92.3%(60/65) for vancomycin. Sensitivity of MRSA was 83.3% (20/24) for chloramphenicol, 35.6% (32/90) for gentamicin, 24.6% (30/122) for ciprofloxacin, 34.1% (42/123) for clindamycin, 8.0% (9/112) for erythromycin, 75%(12/16) for nitrofurantoin,65.8%(73/111) for fusidic acid, 99%(96/97) for linezolid, 58.9%(76/129) for co-trimoxazole, 87%(80/92) for teicoplanin & 98.5%(134/136) for vancomycin. Sensitivity of MRSA was significantly low compared to the sensitivity of the MSSA against erythromycin (P = 0.000), ciprofloxacin (P = 0.000), clindamycin (P = 0.000) & gentamicin (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Skin & soft tissue infections were the most common infections caused by S. aureus. MRSA rates were alarmingly high in the study cohort. Less than 50% of MRSA were sensitive to erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, & clindamycin and it was significantly low compared to the sensitivity of MSSA against same antibiotics. Vancomycin and linezolid are effective empiric antibiotics for both MSSA & MRSA.Item Analysis of Clinically Significant Acinetobacter Spp Isolated from a Base Hospital (BH) of Sri Lanka during a One-Year Period(19th Conference on Postgraduate Research, International Postgraduate Research Conference 2018, Faculty of Graduate Studies,University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka, 2018) Wijesooriya, L.I.; Jayawardana, G.P.C.; de Silva, S.H.N.A.Introduction: Acinetobacter spp are potential opportunistic pathogens. Being a water-trophic organism, it stays in humidifier water, sink basins, suction apparatus, disinfectant fluids etc. Number of cases due to Acinetobacter spp are increasing globally & locally. Treatment of Acinetobacter infections is a great challenge due to its resistance to most antibiotics. However, awareness about antibiotic sensitivity (ABST) pattern of the organism would streamline empiric antibiotic therapy. Objective: To identify the burden & ABST pattern of Acinetobacter spp isolated duringa one-year period. Method: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was carried out involving patients with clinically significant Acinetobacter infection at BH, Wathupitiwala from 01/08/2017 to 31/07/2018. The number of Acinetobacter spp identified from the total number of positive cultures obtained during the same period was analyzed. Demographic& clinical data of patients infected with Acinetobacter spp were also analyzed. ABST (John-Stokes method) of Acinetobacter spp were analyzed for gentamicin, amikacin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefepime, cefoperazone-sulbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, ampicillin-sulbactam, ticarcillin-clavulanic acid, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, co-trimoxazole, meropenem& polymyxin B. Results: Of 920 total bacterial cultures performed over the study period, 44% (404/920 - urine samples, 26% (238/920) - sputum, 23% (215/920) - pus & wound swabs & 7% (63/920) - blood. Of positive blood cultures, 7% (5/63) were by Acinetobacter. Of the total, satisfactorily taken sputum samples, 21% (65/238) were positive for Acinetobacter. Acinetobacter positivitywas 7% (17/215) from pus & wound swabs. None (0/404) of the urine samples grew Acinetobacter. Of 87 patients, who had Acinetobacter infections, all were inpatients while 56.3% were males & 43.7% were females. Age distribution; 0% children (<12 years), 68.9 % adults (12- 65 years) & 31.1% elderly (>65 years) patients. As per ABST, sensitivity was 4.5% for cefotaxime, 6.9% for ceftriaxone, 9.2% for ticarcillin-clavulanic acid & ceftazidime each, 12.6% for cefepime, 16% for gentamicin & ciprofloxacin each, 14.9% for piperacillin-tazobactam & meropenem each, 16.1% for levofloxacin & co-trimoxazole each, 17.2% for ampicillin-sulbactam, 25.3% for amikacin, 60.9% for cefoperazone-sulbactam, & 94.2% for polymyxin B. Conclusion: Most Acinetobacter spp were recovered from respiratory samples indicating its preponderance to cause respiratory tract infections. Most Acinetobacter infections were from inward, adult, males. A great majority of Acinetobacter spp were sensitive to polymyxin B. Only about 2/3rd of isolates were sensitive to cefoperazone-sulbactam & sensitivity was <25% for commonly used cephalosporins, carbapenems, quinolones, aminoglycosides, co-trimoxazole, & beta-lactam – beta-lactam inhibitor combinationsItem A Descriptive Study on Antibiotic Resistant, Clinically Significant Coliform Species Isolated from the Patients at Colombo North Teaching Hospital (CNTH), Ragama, Sri Lanka(19th Conference on Postgraduate Research, International Postgraduate Research Conference 2018, Faculty of Graduate Studies,University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka, 2018) Wijesooriya, L.I.; Namalie, K.D.; Sunil-Chandra, N.P.Introduction: Antibiotic resistance (AR) is a great therapeutic challenge globally and locally today. The rate of development of AR is far ahead compared to the discovery of a new class of antibiotics, which has not been successful in last three decades. Of the antibiotic resistant coliforms, extended spectrum beta-lactamase producers (ESBLP) play a key role in life threatening infections. Moreover, emergence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) has further limited the effective therapeutic options. Objective: To investigate the AR of clinically significant Enterobacteriaceae isolated from patients in a tertiary healthcare setting. Method: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted involving patients with coliform infections at CNTH from 01/03/2018 to 31/08/2018. Demographic details, clinical data & antibiotic sensitivity test (ABST) patterns were analyzed. ABST was performed according to John-Stokes method & ESBLPwere identified by the keyhole method. Resistance to either meropenem or imipenem is used to identify CRE. Statistical analysis was done via R programming language (level of significance P<0.05). Results: Of the 200 coliforms, 85.5% (171/200) were from inpatients & the rest were from outpatients. Of the studied patients, 53.5% (107/200) were females & 46.5% (93/200) were males. Of the Enterobacteriaceae spp isolated, 48.5% (97/200) were from urine, 34.5% (69/200) from pus / wound swabs, 9.5% (19/200) respiratory samples, 3% (6/200) sterile fluids & stents, & 3% (6/200) from blood & CVP tips. As per ABST, about 90% were resistant to ampicillin. Resistance was 61-70% against cefuroxime (oral), ciprofloxacin & nalidixic acid, 60% for amoxiclav, 41-50% for cefotaxime, cefuroxime (intravenous), co-trimoxazole, levofloxacin, norfloxacin & ofloxacin, 31-40% for cefepime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone & nitrofurantoin, 21-30% for gentamicin & piperacillin tazobactam & 0-10% for amikacin & meropenem. Of the coliforms, 29% (58/200) were ESBLP & 8% (16/200) were CRE. None of the ESBLP was CRE. Of CRE, 37% (10/16) were resistant to amikacin. However, 93.8% (15/16) of CRE were colistin sensitive. Conclusion: Majority of the isolates represented infections of the inward patients & there was no statistically significant difference between male & female proportions. Coliforms were detectedmostly from urine. Majority (>50%) of clinically significant Enterobacteriaceae were resistant to most of the oral antibiotics namely cefuroxime, ciprofloxacin, nalidixic acid & amoxiclav. Of the oral antibiotics, nitrofurantoin has the lowest resistance against Enterobacteriaceae. None of the antibiotics had 100% sensitivity against Enterobacteriaceae. Results indicate that ESBLP can be safely treated with carbapenems. Colistin will be an effective empiric antibiotic for CRE.Item A Pilot Study on Antibiotic Prescription by General Practitioners in Ragama Medical Officer of Health (MOH) area, Western Province, Sri Lanka(19th Conference on Postgraduate Research, International Postgraduate Research Conference 2018, Faculty of Graduate Studies,University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka, 2018) Wijesooriya, L.I.; Perera, D.P.; Dissanayake, D.M.D.P.; Wijenayake, D.L.C.D.; Siriwardana, S.R.Introduction: Antibiotic usage in healthcare has increased dramatically over past few decades. In parallel, bacteria have developed antibiotics resistance (AR) making a great challenge in healthcare. However, antibiotic misuse is a key behind AR. Therefore, strict regulation of antibiotic use is mandatory to minimize the development of AR. Hence, antibiotics are color-coded as red (Circular No. 01-56/2016, Ministry of Health, Sri Lanka), orange and green light antibiotics according to the level of authorization. However, these circulars and national antibiotic guidelines are mainly focusedinhospital practice. Hence, it is important to understand the current antibiotic prescription at general practitioner (GP) level. Objective: To study antibiotic prescription patterns of GPs in Ragama MOH area, Western Province, Sri Lanka. Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive study was piloted involving 100 antibiotic prescribing encounters. (Total sample number was six hundred according to the WHO manual on “how to investigate drug use in health facilities”). Six randomly selected general practitioners, registered in general practitioners’ registry, published by College of General Practitioners of Sri Lanka, and practicing in Ragama MOH area were involved for the study which was conducted from May – August 2017. Data were collected from patients, using a pre-tested, interviewer-administered questionnaire. Demographic and clinical data of patients &details of antibiotic prescription as type, dose, frequency and duration were analyzed. Results: Of 100 antibiotic prescriptions, 23% for children (<12-65 years), 64% for adults (12-65 years) and 13% for elderly (>65 years) patients. Antibiotic prescription; 69% for respiratory tract infections (RTI), 12% skin infections 7% digestive tract infections, 2% urinary tract infections (UTI) and 10% for other infections. Common antibiotics prescribed for RTIs were amoxicillin (27.5%), Cephalexin (24.6%), followed by amoxiclav (17.4%), azithromycin (14.5%), clarithromycin (11.6%) cefixime (2.9%) & levofloxacin (1.4%). Ciprofloxacin was prescribed for digestive tract infections, UTI& sinusitis. All antibiotics were prescribed as per recommended doses and frequencies. Duration of antibiotics prescribed for RTI ranged from 3-15 days; in 29.4%, it was for 5 days, in 25% and 17.5% it was for 3 & 4 days respectively. In 33.8% prescriptions, duration of antibiotic therapy was more than 5 days. Conclusion: RTIs were the commonest condition for which antibiotics were prescribed. The most common antibiotics prescribed for RTIs were amoxicillin & cephalexin. A considerable number of prescriptions for RTIs was less than the minimum treatment duration recommended in the national guideline for empirical and prophylactic use of antimicrobials. Use of ciprofloxacin, (orange light antibiotic) and levofloxacin (red light antibiotic) has been noted in general practice.Item Exploring the Cause of an Outbreak of Neonatal Sepsis Following Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in a Base Hospital, Sri Lanka(19th Conference on Postgraduate Research, International Postgraduate Research Conference 2018, Faculty of Graduate Studies,University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka, 2018) Wijesooriya, L.I.; Jayaratna, H.S.; Wanasinghe, D.S.Introduction: Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) are defined as infections which were not present or incubating at the time of admission but occur during the process of care in a hospital or other healthcare facility. HAIs are one of the major causes of the increasing number of mortality and morbidity in hospitals. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) has been identified as one of the four common types of nosocomial (HAI) infections. VAP is defined as parenchymal lung infection occurring more than 48 hours after initiation of mechanical ventilation and nebulization. Though VAP starts as local infection, it could complicate into sepsis. An outbreak of sepsis was reported in seven babies, who were admitted and ventilated at the premature baby care unit (PBU) of Base Hospital, Wathupitiwala within a period of three weeks since 30th July 2017. Objective: To identify the causative agent/s of the outbreak of neonatal sepsis occurred in PBU, Base Hospital, Wathupitiwala. Method: Blood culture isolates, which were detected within 24 hours of incubation at BacT/Alert automated blood culture system from seven affected babies, were tested further to identify whether the neonatal sepsis occurred due to a common pathogen. Initial Gram staining and oxidase test were followed by species-level identification using RapID NF plus system (remel RapID system). In brief, pure cultures of causative organisms were grown on blood agar after incubation at 370C for 24 hours. Testing was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Six-digit microcode obtained at the end of the test was interpreted using electronic RapID compendium (ERICTM) database to obtain species-level identification. Further biochemical tests (catalase test, oxidation & fermentation (OF) of glucose & lactose) were performed to refine the diagnosis. Results: All seven, blood cultures grew Gram-negative, oxidase positive bacilli. All blood culture isolates got the same identification via RapID NF plus system with the same microcode (400216). Interpretation via ERICTM database suggested three possible organisms as Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes, Pseudomonas stutzeri and Burkholderia cepacia. Further biochemical tests namely positive catalase test, growth on MacConkey agar, green coloration of glucose well in RapID NF plus system and positive OF test for glucose and lactose, confirmed the diagnosis of the isolates as B. cepacia. Conclusion: The aetiological agent for the outbreak of neonatal sepsis was identified as B. cepacia. Since all babies had the risk factor of being ventilated, there was a possibility of having the source related to ventilator equipment, solutions, drugs etc. It is important to investigate for possible source/s of an outbreak in order to curtail it as early as possible.Item A Case of Urinary Tract Infection Caused by Providencia stuartii in a Sterile Mid-Stream Urine Sample(19th Conference on Postgraduate Research, International Postgraduate Research Conference 2018, Faculty of Graduate Studies,University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka, 2018) Wijesooriya, L.I.; Siriwardana, S.R.Introduction: Urinary tract infections (UTI) are frequently caused by enterobacteria and most commonly caused by Escherichia coli both in the community and hospital settings. UTIs are diagnosed microbiologically by culturing mid-stream urine sample in non-catheterized patients. Significant bacteriuria is defined as having pure growth of >105 colony forming units/ml of urine. Treatment of UTIs is guided by antibiotic sensitivity testing of the isolated pathogen. Herewith, we report a case of upper UTI with no growth in midstream urine sample. Case report: A 65-year-old male was admitted to a Private Hospital, Ragama with high spiking fever and left, low backache for four days. His past medical history was unremarkable and renal calculi were not known previously. On examination, he was febrile but systemic examination was uneventful except left loin tenderness. Urine full report was normal except having red cells of 10-5/high power filed. Blood and urine cultures were sterile. Serum creatinine was rising (2.9, 3.01, 4.16 mg/dL). Full blood count showed leukocytosis (11,400–15,900/ mm3) - with neutrophilia (75%-87%). His C-reactive protein levels were rising at 81,93,133 mg/L. Abdominal ultrasound scanning revealed dilated pelvicalyceal system filled with echogenic debris, suggestive of pyonephrosis. Further, left upper ureter was dilated due to obstruction by a 10mm sized calculus. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) was performed and a 7F pigtailed catheter was inserted. Drain fluid was cultured on blood and MacConkey agar and incubated overnight at 370C yielding a heavy growth of Gram-negative bacilli, which were oxidase negative. The pathogen was identified into species level using the RapID™ ONE system as Providencia stuartii. As per antibiotic sensitivity test, the organism was resistant to amoxicillin, gentamicin, cefuroxime, cefotaxime, co-amoxiclav, ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, co-trimoxazole, piperacillin-tazobactam, and ticarcillin-clavulanic acid. It was sensitive only to amikacin, imipenem & meropenem. The patient was treated with intravenous ceftriaxone 1g (only one dose) and intravenous ciprofloxacin 400mg twice a day for 2 days. However, the patient did not improve clinically. Since the pathogen was resistant to empiric therapy, the patient was treated with meropenem 1g 8 hourly for one week and the patient had an uneventful recovery. Conclusion: It is important to note that UTI is a possibility even though urine culture is sterile since bacterial cultures may be negative due to many reasons. Hence, it is important to probe with other means of investigations such as interventional procedures to evacuate possible foci of infection and obtain relevant samples for microbiological identification to confirm the clinical diagnosis and thereby streamline antibiotic therapy