First-trimester ultrasound dating of twin pregnancy: are singleton charts reliable?
dc.contributor.author | Dias, T. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mahsud-Dornan, S. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Thilaganathan, B. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Papageorghiou, A. T. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Bhide, A. | en_US |
dc.creator.corporateauthor | Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (Great Britain) | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-10-29T09:28:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-10-29T09:28:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | en_US |
dc.description | Indexed in MEDLINE | |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of validated singleton crown-rump length (CRL) formulae in dating twin pregnancies at 11-14 weeks of gestation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Fetal medicine unit of a London teaching hospital. SAMPLE: Three hundred and eighty-four pregnancies with known dates of conception. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 266 singletons and 118 twin pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilisation (IVF), with a known date of conception. The gestation calculated from the date of conception was compared with the expected gestation from fetal size using a number of different CRL formulae. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Difference in gestational age computed from fetal size (CRL) of the bigger and smaller fetus in twin pregnancies and singleton pregnancies using three formulae. RESULTS: Two of the three studied CRL formulae systematically underestimated the mean gestational age and size of singleton IVF pregnancies (Robinson formula: gestation = 1.4 days, size = 2.7 mm). Twin CRL measurements straddled those of singletons, regardless of the CRL formula used (Robinson formula: larger twin gestation = 2.4 days, size = 4.7 mm; smaller twin gestation = 0.8 days, size = 1.7 mm). These underestimates in gestation and size for IVF singleton and twin pregnancies are well within the known limits of accuracy of first = trimester ultrasound measurements, and are of limited clinical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Currently available CRL charts underestimate both the age and size of IVF singleton pregnancies by a clinically insignificant amount. This difference is similar for twin pregnancies, suggesting that singleton CRL charts can be used to date twin pregnancies accurately. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2010; 117(8): pp.979-84 | en_US |
dc.identifier.department | Obstetrics and Gynaecology | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1470-0328 (Print) | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1471-0528 (Electronic) | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/1982 | |
dc.publisher | Wiley | en_US |
dc.subject | Pregnancy, Twin | en_US |
dc.title | First-trimester ultrasound dating of twin pregnancy: are singleton charts reliable? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.71 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: