Prediction of selective fetal growth restriction and twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome in monochorionic twins

dc.contributor.authorMemmo, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDias, T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMahsud-Dornan, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPapageorghiou, A. T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBhide, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorThilaganathan, B.en_US
dc.creator.corporateauthorRoyal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (Great Britain)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-29T09:40:06Z
dc.date.available2014-10-29T09:40:06Z
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.descriptionIndexed in MEDLINE
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To study the correlation of discrepancy between crown-rump length (CRL) and nuchal translucency (NT) in monochorionic twins at 11-14 weeks of gestation and subsequent development of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) and selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary-care Fetal Medicine Unit, London. SAMPLE: Monochorionic twin pregnancies with known outcome. METHODS: Inter-twin discrepancy was calculated as a percentage of the larger CRL and smaller NT and compared among those developing TTTS, those with sFGR and those with normal outcome. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to evaluate the performance of inter-twin discrepancy in prediction of sFGR and TTTS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Development of TTTS and sFGR. RESULTS: A total of 242 monochorionic twin pregnancies were studied (102 TTTS, 36 sFGR and 104 controls). The median CRL discrepancy in the sFGR group (11.9%) was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than in the TTTS group (3.8%) and control group (3.5%). Median inter-twin NT discrepancies were not significantly different (P = 0.869) between sFGR and both TTTS and control groups (15.6%, 16.7% and 14.8%, respectively). Discrepancy in CRL performs well as a screening test for sFGR (area under ROC curve = 0.89), but not for TTTS (area under ROC curve = 0.58). CONCLUSIONS: First-trimester CRL discrepancy in monochorionic twins is a marker for subsequent development of sFGR rather than TTTS. Inter-twin NT discrepancy does not appear to be significantly different in these two groups from those with normal outcome.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2012; 119(4): 417-21en_US
dc.identifier.departmentObstetrics and Gynaecologyen_US
dc.identifier.issn1470-0328 (Print)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-0528 (Electronic)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/2211
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.subjectPregnancy, Twinen_US
dc.titlePrediction of selective fetal growth restriction and twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome in monochorionic twinsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: