Prevalence of Anopheline species in Ampara district, Sri Lanka
dc.contributor.author | Fernando, M.A.S.T. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Gunathilaka, P.A.D.H.N. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Hapugoda, M.D. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | de Silva, B.G.D.N.K. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wijeyerathne, P. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Abeyewickreme, W. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-06-18T03:53:19Z | en_US |
dc.date.available | 2015-06-18T03:53:19Z | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | en_US |
dc.description | Poster Presentation Abstract, Annual Research Symposium, FGS, University of Kelaniya, November, 2012, Kelaniya | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Investigating the presence of primary and secondary vectors of malaria in the selected areas where no entomological surveillance was carried out for about 30 years due to ethnic conflict. Objective: To study prevalence of malaria vector in Ampara District and to assess the risk of malaria in the area. Method: Surveillance was preformed from January 2011 to June 2012 in 4 selected areas (i.e. Panama, Thirukkovil, Mahaoya and Dehiattakandiya) in Ampara District. From each area 4 localities (total 16 localities) were selected for the sample collection in order to ensure full coverage of the District. Cattle Baited Hut Collection (CBHC) and Cattle Baited Net Collection (CBNC) were performed as sample collecting methods on monthly basis throughout the surveillance period. Results: Mosquito densities for each collected Anopheles species were calculated as density per hut or net for CBHT and CBNT respectively. 14 Anopheles species were recorded from CBHC with high prevalence for An. subpictus (68.58%), An. nigerrimus (14.02%) and An. vagus (6.73%). 16 Anopheles species were recorded from CBNC with high prevelance of An. nigerrimus (50.07%), An. peditaeniatus (16.12%), An. pseudojemesi (9.21%) and An. subpictus (7.68%). An. culicifacies (primary malaria vector in Sri Lanka) recorded with lesser densities but An. subpictus, the secondary vector for malaria in Sri Lanka was predominant thorough out this study. Conclusions: The presence of primary and secondary malaria vectors in the area may cause a malaria epidemic in these areas. Hence, it is essential to study the seasonal prevalence of Anopheles species in order to initiate timely controlling measures in Ampara District. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Proceedings of the Annual Research Symposium, Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of Kelaniya. 2012; 13: 50. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | en_US | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/8354 | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of Kelaniya | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Malaria | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Malaria-epidemiology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Anopheles | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Insect Vectors | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Prevalence | en_US |
dc.title | Prevalence of Anopheline species in Ampara district, Sri Lanka | en_US |
dc.type | Conference Abstract | en_US |