How can we reduce negative laparoscopies for pelvic pain?

dc.contributor.authorSingh, N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRashid, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHerath, R.P.en_US
dc.creator.corporateauthorUniversity of London Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecologyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-29T09:32:34Z
dc.date.available2014-10-29T09:32:34Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.description.abstractChronic pelvic pain is a common condition and the RCOG guideline provides an evidence-based framework for the initial assessment. This study investigated the adequacy and relevance of the initial assessment in patients who underwent elective laparoscopic procedure for pelvic pain. History-taking was found to be deficient and was unable to identify factors which may be related to the cause or perception of the pain. Only a small percentage benefitted from a therapeutic trial of hormonal and non-hormonal agents and referral to other specialities. Ultrasound and bimanual examination were both found to be of little value. Laparoscopy assisted in diagnosis in 45% of patients. A structured initial assessment and targeted selection of patients for laparoscopy would reduce the number of patients with normal findings and thus, it would reduce the number of women who suffer pain and isolation after a negative laparoscopy.
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; 31(1): pp.62-8en_US
dc.identifier.issn0144-3615 (Print)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1364-6893 (Electronic)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/2068
dc.publisherInforma Healthcareen_US
dc.titleHow can we reduce negative laparoscopies for pelvic pain?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: