Medicine
Permanent URI for this communityhttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/12
This repository contains the published and unpublished research of the Faculty of Medicine by the staff members of the faculty
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item Why are specialists reluctant to reply to referral letters-exploring the views of specialists in Sri Lanka(Lahore Institute of Public Health(liphealth), 2014) Ramanayake, R.P.J.C.; Perera, D.P.; de Silva, A.H.W.; Sumanasekera, R.D.N.; Fernando, K.A.T.; Jayasinghe, L.R.; Athukorala, L.A.C.L.BACKGROUND: The referral letter from General Practitioner and the reply from the Specialist is the interface between the primary and secondary/tertiary levels of care. It facilitates the referral process and is beneficial for optimizing patient care. In Sri Lanka there is no established referral/back referral system. Not receiving a response to their referrals is a common grievance made by most primary care doctors. In this scenario, the views of Specialists were explored on the importance of reply letters and measures to improve communication. METHOD: Conducted in 2013, this study consisted of in-depth interviews using a semi-structured format, with 21 purposively selected Specialists representing a range of specialties. They included clinicians and university academics from both the government and the private sector. Specialists rarely contacting a GP, such as anesthesiologists and microbiologists, were not invited to participate. Analysis was by generating a thematic framework based on the recurrent themes and issues which was then applied to the textual data. RESULTS: Most Specialists identify that it is important to reply to referrals. These reply letters provide the Primary care doctors with a further management plan, enhance continuity of care and is a source of education to the General Practitioner. Despite the above benefits, the practice of writing a reply is dependent on the following factors: time constraints, lack of clerical assistance, known General Practitioner, patient’s condition and the quality of the referral letter. As methods of improving communication between primary and secondary care it was suggested that referrals be made mandatory to be seen by a Specialist, improving informal communication between Specialists and GPs via regional clinical meetings and introducing a structured referral letter with an attached reply form. CONCLUSIONS: Specialists acknowledge the importance of reply letters in the referral process. Further steps need to be taken to improve the reply rates. This includes changes that need to occur in the referring General Practitioners, Specialists and the practicing institutions creating an environment that is conducive to the referral process.Item A Pilot Study on Antibiotic Prescription by General Practitioners in Ragama Medical Officer of Health (MOH) area, Western Province, Sri Lanka(19th Conference on Postgraduate Research, International Postgraduate Research Conference 2018, Faculty of Graduate Studies,University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka, 2018) Wijesooriya, L.I.; Perera, D.P.; Dissanayake, D.M.D.P.; Wijenayake, D.L.C.D.; Siriwardana, S.R.Introduction: Antibiotic usage in healthcare has increased dramatically over past few decades. In parallel, bacteria have developed antibiotics resistance (AR) making a great challenge in healthcare. However, antibiotic misuse is a key behind AR. Therefore, strict regulation of antibiotic use is mandatory to minimize the development of AR. Hence, antibiotics are color-coded as red (Circular No. 01-56/2016, Ministry of Health, Sri Lanka), orange and green light antibiotics according to the level of authorization. However, these circulars and national antibiotic guidelines are mainly focusedinhospital practice. Hence, it is important to understand the current antibiotic prescription at general practitioner (GP) level. Objective: To study antibiotic prescription patterns of GPs in Ragama MOH area, Western Province, Sri Lanka. Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive study was piloted involving 100 antibiotic prescribing encounters. (Total sample number was six hundred according to the WHO manual on “how to investigate drug use in health facilities”). Six randomly selected general practitioners, registered in general practitioners’ registry, published by College of General Practitioners of Sri Lanka, and practicing in Ragama MOH area were involved for the study which was conducted from May – August 2017. Data were collected from patients, using a pre-tested, interviewer-administered questionnaire. Demographic and clinical data of patients &details of antibiotic prescription as type, dose, frequency and duration were analyzed. Results: Of 100 antibiotic prescriptions, 23% for children (<12-65 years), 64% for adults (12-65 years) and 13% for elderly (>65 years) patients. Antibiotic prescription; 69% for respiratory tract infections (RTI), 12% skin infections 7% digestive tract infections, 2% urinary tract infections (UTI) and 10% for other infections. Common antibiotics prescribed for RTIs were amoxicillin (27.5%), Cephalexin (24.6%), followed by amoxiclav (17.4%), azithromycin (14.5%), clarithromycin (11.6%) cefixime (2.9%) & levofloxacin (1.4%). Ciprofloxacin was prescribed for digestive tract infections, UTI& sinusitis. All antibiotics were prescribed as per recommended doses and frequencies. Duration of antibiotics prescribed for RTI ranged from 3-15 days; in 29.4%, it was for 5 days, in 25% and 17.5% it was for 3 & 4 days respectively. In 33.8% prescriptions, duration of antibiotic therapy was more than 5 days. Conclusion: RTIs were the commonest condition for which antibiotics were prescribed. The most common antibiotics prescribed for RTIs were amoxicillin & cephalexin. A considerable number of prescriptions for RTIs was less than the minimum treatment duration recommended in the national guideline for empirical and prophylactic use of antimicrobials. Use of ciprofloxacin, (orange light antibiotic) and levofloxacin (red light antibiotic) has been noted in general practice.